Citation network
Marsh Vs. Chambers
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jul 05, 1983
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 783 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court Marsh v. ChambersSearch
-
U.S. 783 (1983) Marsh v. ChambersSearch
-
F.2d 228, 233 (1982). Applying the three-part test of Lemon v. KurtzmanSearch
-
U. S. 602 , 403 U. S. 612 -613 (1971), as set out in Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. NyquistSearch
-
Wisconsin v. PelicanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Ins. Co., 127 U. S. 265 , 127 U. S. 297 (1888). In Walz v. TaxSearch
-
had just declared acceptable. In applying the First Amendment to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, Cantwell v. ConnecticutSearch
-
legislative prayer presents no more potential for establishment than the provision of school transportation, Everson v. BoardSearch
-
of Education, 330 U. S. 1 (1947), beneficial grants for higher education, Tilton v. RichardsonSearch
-
organizations, Walz, supra. Respondent cites JUSTICE BRENNAN's concurring opinion in Abington School Dist. v. SchemppSearch
-
Colo v. TreasurerSearch
-
Panhandle Oil Co. v. MississippiSearch
-
Clause. The most commonly cited formulation of prevailing Establishment Clause doctrine is found in Lemon v. KurtzmanSearch
-
Larkin v. Grendel'sSearch
-
See Abington School Dist. v. SchemppSearch
-
Everson v. BoardSearch
-
of Education, 330 U. S. 1 , 330 U. S. 16 (1947), quoting Reynolds v. UnitedSearch
-
or denominations, but extend as well to the relationship of government to religious beliefs and practices. In Torcaso v. WatkinsSearch
-
or conflicts with a particular religious belief is, for that reason, an establishment of religion. See, e.g., McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
The practice of legislative prayer is nothing like the statutes we considered in McGowan and Harris v. McRaeSearch
-
Our cases have recognized that the purposes of the Establishment Clause can sometimes conflict. For example, in Walz v. TaxSearch
-
See Richardson v. RamirezSearch
-
Abington School Dist. v. SchemppSearch
-
West Virginia Bd. of Education v. BarnetteSearch
-
Schempp, supra, at 374 U. S. 240 -241 (BRENNAN, J., concurring). Cf. McDaniel v. PatySearch
-
See Zorach v. ClausonSearch
-
Abington School Dist. v. SchemppSearch
-
Larkin v. Grendel'sSearch
-
Wolman v. WalterSearch
-
Public Education & Religious Liberty v. NyquistSearch
-
See Stone v. GrahamSearch
-
Cf. Stone v. GrahamSearch
-
See Larkin v. Grendel'sSearch
-
Walz v. TaxSearch
-
must be invalidated unless it is justified by a compelling governmental interest, cf. Widmar v. VincentSearch
-
U. S. 263 , 454 U. S. 269 -270 (1981), and unless it is closely fitted to further that interest, Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Marsh v. ChambersSearch
-
of Lemon v. KurtzmanSearch
-
Public Education & Religious Liberty v. NyquistSearch
-
In Walz v. TaxSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial