Citation network
Michigan Vs. Long
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jul 06, 1983
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 1032 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court Michigan v. LongSearch
-
U.S. 1032 (1983) Michigan v. LongSearch
-
of Appeals affirmed, holding that the search of the passenger compartment was valid as a protective search under Terry v. OhioSearch
-
U. S. 1 , and that the search of the trunk was valid as an inventory search under South Dakota v. OppermanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
opinion, post, p. 463 U. S. 1065 . JUSTICE O'CONNOR delivered the opinion of the Court. In Terry v. OhioSearch
-
search under Terry, supra, and that the search of the trunk was valid as an inventory search under South Dakota v. OppermanSearch
-
taken the strict view that, if the ground of decision was at all unclear, we would dismiss the case. See, e.g., Lynch v. NewSearch
-
U. S. 52 (1934). In other instances, we have vacated, Page 463 U. S. 1039 see, e.g., Minnesota v. NationalSearch
-
Tea Co., 309 U. S. 551 (1940), or continued a case, see, e.g., Herb v. PitcairnSearch
-
U. S. 117 (1945), in order to obtain clarification about the nature of a state court decision. See also California v. KrivdaSearch
-
to guide their application of state law or to provide the actual basis for the decision that was reached. See Texas v. BrownSearch
-
U. S. 730 , 460 U. S. 732 -733, n. 1 (1983) (plurality opinion). Cf. South Dakota v. NevilleSearch
-
U. S. 553 , 459 U. S. 569 (1983) (STEVENS, J., dissenting). In Oregon v. KennedySearch
-
because of the delay and decrease in efficiency of judicial Page 463 U. S. 1040 administration, see Dixon v. DuffySearch
-
burdens on state courts to demonstrate the presence or absence of our jurisdiction. See Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. JeromeSearch
-
jurisdiction to review a case that is alleged to rest on adequate and independent state grounds, see Abie State Bank v. BryanSearch
-
he Court of Appeals erroneously applied the principles of Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Zacchini v. Scripps-HowardSearch
-
U.S. at 392 U. S. 21 (quoting Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
detentions involving suspects in vehicles are especially fraught with danger to police officers. In Pennsylvania v. MimmsSearch
-
Id. at 434 U. S. 110 . In Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
access to weapons, even though they may not themselves be armed. In the Term following Terry, we decided Chimel v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Ibid. In New York v. BeltonSearch
-
U.S. at 453 U. S. 460 (footnote omitted). See also Michigan v. SummersSearch
-
to ignore the contraband, and the Fourth Amendment does not require its suppression in such circumstances. Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
Texas v. BrownSearch
-
suspect in Long's position break away from police control and retrieve a weapon from his automobile. See United State v. RainoneSearch
-
he will be permitted to reenter his automobile, and he will then have access to any weapons inside. United States v. PowlessSearch
-
of Appeals upheld the search of the trunk as a valid inventory search under this Court's decision in South Dakota v. OppermanSearch
-
because it was not passed upon by the Michigan Supreme Court, whose decision we review in this case. See Cardinale v. LouisianaSearch
-
trunk search was permissible under Opperman, supra, or other decisions of this Court. See, e.g., United States v. RossSearch
-
Long for speeding or for driving while intoxicated, they could have searched the passenger compartment under New York v. BeltonSearch
-
U. S. 454 (1981), and the trunk under United States v. RossSearch
-
Chief Justice Coleman dissented, arguing that Terry v. OhioSearch
-
that there was an available state ground for decision on which the state court could properly have relied. Beecher v. AlabamaSearch
-
treat a normally adequate state ground as independent, and there will be no question about our jurisdiction. Delaware v. ProuseSearch
-
U. S. 648 , 440 U. S. 653 (1979) (quoting Zacchini v. Scripps-HowardSearch
-
Broadcasting Co., 433 U. S. 562 , 433 U. S. 568 (1977)). See also South Dakota v. NevilleSearch
-
Enterprise Irrigation District v. FarmersSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial