Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Barefoot Vs. Estelle

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jul 06, 1983

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

71 entries 8 linked 63 unlinked
Show
  1. Garrison Vs. Patterson US Supreme Court · May 27, 1968
  2. Brooks Vs. Estelle US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1982
  3. Gregg Vs. Georgia US Supreme Court · Jul 02, 1976
  4. Addington Vs. Texas US Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1979
  5. Forsyth Vs. Doolittle US Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1887
  6. Nowakowski Vs. Maroney US Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1967
  7. O'Connor Vs. Donaldson US Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1975
  8. United States Vs. Spaulding US Supreme Court · Jan 07, 1935
  9. U.S. 880 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court Barefoot v. Estelle
    Search
  10. U.S. 880 (1983) Barefoot v. Estelle
    Search
  11. to address the merits, and such practice was within the bounds of this Court's prior decisions, such as Garrison v. Patterson
    Search
  12. The court rejected all of these contentions and affirmed the conviction and sentence on March 12, 1980, Barefoot v. State
    Search
  13. the filing and disposition of a petition for certiorari, which was filed and then denied on June 29, 1981. Barefoot v. Texas
    Search
  14. to brief and argue the merits as they saw fit, the requirements set forth in this Court's cases, such as Garrison v. Patterson
    Search
  15. U. S. 464 (1968), Nowakowski v. Maroney
    Search
  16. U. S. 542 (1967), and Carafas v. LaVallee
    Search
  17. supra, at 391 U. S. 466 (per curiam). See Nowakowski v. Maroney
    Search
  18. Carafas v. Page
    Search
  19. U.S. at 391 U. S. 466 . See Carafas v. LaVallee
    Search
  20. practice of requiring a showing of some prospect of success on the merits before issuing a stay of execution, O'Bryan v. Estelle
    Search
  21. were directed to file briefs and to present oral argument. In light of the Fifth Circuit's announced practice, O'Bryan v. Estelle
    Search
  22. does here, refused to stay an execution in a case where the Court of Appeals followed very similar procedures. Brooks v. Estelle
    Search
  23. Stewart v. Beto
    Search
  24. F.2d 268, 270, n. 2 (CA5 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 925 (1972). See also Ramsey v. Hand
    Search
  25. Goode v. Wainwright
    Search
  26. See Sanders v. United
    Search
  27. White v. Florida
    Search
  28. U. S. 1301 , 458 U. S. 1302 (1982) (POWELL, J., in chambers) (quoting Times-Picayune Publishing Corp. v. Page
    Search
  29. further crimes is a constitutionally acceptable criterion for imposing the death penalty, which it is, Jurek v. Texas
    Search
  30. the judgment said that the jury should be presented with all of the relevant information. Furthermore, in Estelle v. Smith
    Search
  31. California v. Ramos
    Search
  32. question those other contexts in which predictions of future behavior are constantly made. For example, in O'Connor v. Donaldson
    Search
  33. Psychiatric Association (APA). As indicated above, however, the same view was presented and rejected in Estelle v. Smith
    Search
  34. admitted as evidence where it might help the factfinder do its assigned job. As the Court said long ago in Spring Co. v. Edgar
    Search
  35. as witnesses in matters pertaining to their professional calling. Page 463 U. S. 904 See also Dexter v. Hall
    Search
  36. Bram v. United
    Search
  37. case. At bottom, to agree with petitioner's basic position would seriously undermine and in effect overrule Jurek v. Texas
    Search
  38. This provision required a stay of execution pending disposition of an appeal in capital cases. Rogers v. Peck
    Search
  39. Gordon v. Willis
    Search
  40. F.Supp. 911, 913 (ND Ga.1980) (citing United Sates ex rel. Jones v. Richmond
    Search
  41. and he hoped that his work would improve the appropriateness and accuracy of clinical predictions. Id. at v. All
    Search
  42. Petitioner relies on People v. Murtishaw
    Search
  43. did not in any way indicate that its holding was based on constitutional grounds. Petitioner also relies on White v. Estelle
    Search
  44. had not been given Miranda warnings or an opportunity to consult with his attorney, as required by Estelle v. Smith
    Search
  45. There is support for this view in our cases, United States v. Spaulding
    Search
  46. been decided by this Court until today, with the exception of the Fifth Circuit's rulings in this case and in Brook v. Estelle
    Search
  47. unless it is clear that the Page 463 U. S. 908 prisoner's appeal is entirely frivolous. See, e.g., Goode v. Wainwright
    Search
  48. Shaw v. Martin
    Search
  49. DeVita v. McCorkle
    Search
  50. U.S. Supreme Court Barefoot v. Estelle
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial