Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Heckler Vs. Lopez

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Sep 09, 1983

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

41 entries 6 linked 35 unlinked
Show
  1. Atiyeh Vs. Capps US Supreme Court · Feb 04, 1981
  2. Morrison Vs. Work US Supreme Court · Jan 05, 1925
  3. Weinberger Vs. Salfi US Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1975
  4. Schmidt Vs. Lessard US Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1974
  5. Schweiker Vs. Hansen US Supreme Court · Apr 06, 1981
  6. Mathews Vs. Eldridge US Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1976
  7. U.S. 1328 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court Heckler v. Lopez
    Search
  8. U.S. 1328 (1983) Heckler v. Lopez
    Search
  9. Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act to recipients in the Ninth Circuit. On the authority of Finnegan v. Matthews
    Search
  10. F.2d 1340 (CA9 1981), Page 463 U. S. 1329 and Patti v. Schweiker
    Search
  11. Gregory-Portland Independent School District v. United
    Search
  12. O'Rourke v. Levine
    Search
  13. of the question involved. See, e.g., Schmidt v. Lessard
    Search
  14. of the Secretary may be obtained, and set forth the standard for the exercise of judicial review. Weinberger v. Salfi
    Search
  15. We have also held that the scope of judicial review of the Secretary's determinations is a very limited one. Heckler v. Campbell
    Search
  16. law enunciated in our decisions. In Vermont Yankee Nuclear Page 463 U. S. 1333 Power Corp. v. Natural
    Search
  17. the discretion of the agencies to which Congress had confided the responsibility for substantive judgments. In FCC v. Schreiber
    Search
  18. In FPC v. Transcontinental
    Search
  19. the court into the domain which Congress has set aside exclusively for the administrative agency.' SEC v. Chenery
    Search
  20. merely freezes the positions of the parties until the court can hear the case on the merits. See University of Texas v. Camenisch
    Search
  21. i) or with this Court's admonition in Schweiker v. Hansen
    Search
  22. Id. at 450 U. S. 788 (quoting Federal Crop Insurance Co. v. Merrill
    Search
  23. g) and over whom arguably the District Court has no jurisdiction. In Weinberger v. Salfi
    Search
  24. before judicial review can be sought. Mathews v. Eldridge
    Search
  25. announcement of her interpretation of a Social Security statute as a waiver of the exhaustion requirement. See Ringer v. Schweiker
    Search
  26. are circumscribed by the principles which I have previously stated. This Court recently granted certiorari in Day v. Schweiker
    Search
  27. stated earlier in this opinion, I do not believe this is such a case. I agree with the statement of this Court in FCC v. Pottsville
    Search
  28. U.S. Supreme Court Heckler v. Lopez
    Search
  29. of Finnegan v. Matthews
    Search
  30. and Patti v. Schweiker
    Search
  31. O'Rourke v. Levine
    Search
  32. Heckler v. Campbell
    Search
  33. Power Corp. v. Natural
    Search
  34. In FCC v. Schreiber
    Search
  35. SEC v. Chenery
    Search
  36. See University of Texas v. Camenisch
    Search
  37. Federal Crop Insurance Co. v. Merrill
    Search
  38. In Weinberger v. Salfi
    Search
  39. See Ringer v. Schweiker
    Search
  40. Day v. Schweiker
    Search
  41. FCC v. Pottsville
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial