Citation network
Maggio Vs. Williams
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 07, 1983
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 46 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court Maggio v. WilliamsSearch
-
U.S. 46 (1983) Maggio v. WilliamsSearch
-
a grocery store in Baton Rouge, La. His conviction and sentence were affirmed by the Louisiana Supreme Court. State v. WilliamsSearch
-
courts. The District Court held no hearing, but issued a written opinion denying Williams' petition. See Williams v. BlackburnSearch
-
of Williams' many objections to his conviction and sentence and affirmed the judgment of the District Court. Williams v. MaggioSearch
-
Court issued a detailed opinion in which it refused to grant the writ or to stay Williams' execution. Williams v. KingSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Williams v. KingSearch
-
grant stays of execution in cases where the Court of Appeals had denied a writ of habeas corpus. Barefoot v. EstelleSearch
-
White v. FloridaSearch
-
U. S. 1301 , 458 U. S. 1302 (1982) (POWELL, J., in chambers) (quoting Times-Picayune Publishing Corp. v. SchulingkampSearch
-
the absence of evidence warranting such an instruction, is claimed to have violated the rule established in Hopper v. EvansSearch
-
who opposed the death penalty at the guilt-innocence phase of Williams' trial, although proper under Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
a substantial question and one concluded that the statements constituted reversible error. State ex rel. Williams v. BlackburnSearch
-
gave it full consideration in the second federal habeas proceeding. Applying the standard established in Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSearch
-
Williams v. MaggioSearch
-
had agreed to decide whether some form of comparative proportionality review is constitutionally required. See Pulley v. HarrisSearch
-
Louisiana Supreme Court's proportionality review scheme that were identical to that raised by Williams. See Lindsey v. LouisianaSearch
-
James v. LouisianaSearch
-
Sonnier v. LouisianaSearch
-
U.S. 1229, rehearing denied, 463 U.S. 1249 (1983). See also Narcisse v. LouisianaSearch
-
asserts that his execution should be stayed because we have issued a stay in another Louisiana death case, Baldwin v. MaggioSearch
-
of his trial counsel, similar to those we shall resolve in two cases set for argument this Term. Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
recently granted a stay in a case raising a proportionality challenge to a death sentence imposed in Texas. Autry v. EstelleSearch
-
jury improperly Page 464 U. S. 55 relied upon other aggravating factors in reaching its verdict. See State v. JamesSearch
-
cert. denied, post, p. 908. That rule was applied by the Louisiana Supreme Court in this very case. See State v. WilliamsSearch
-
on appellate review is constitutionally permissible in the context of Louisiana's death penalty statute, see Zant v. StephensSearch
-
is justified in applying a strict standard of review to this second federal habeas corpus application. See Sanders v. UnitedSearch
-
of this argument, and may have deliberately chosen not to raise it in the first habeas corpus petition. See Barefoot v. EstelleSearch
-
type of constitutional error, I question whether it can be said that this trial was fundamentally unfair. See Rose v. LundySearch
-
penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
-
the disproportionate nature of his sentence. This afternoon, the Court will hear oral argument in Pulley v. HarrisSearch
-
WHITE, just last month, stayed the execution of James David Autry pending our decision in Pulley. See Autry v. EstelleSearch
-
only a Page 464 U. S. 58 districtwide or parish-wide proportionality review in his case. See State v. WilliamsSearch
-
proportionality review is required before any constitutional death sentence may be carried out. See, e.g., Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Supreme Court of Louisiana have randomly applied proportionality reviews that are statewide in scope. See, e.g., State v. MooreSearch
-
State v. NarcisseSearch
-
to these protections is a system that includes meaningful appellate review for every death sentence. See, e.g., Zant v. StephensSearch
-
the constitutionality of his death sentence which is encompassed within the questions presented to the Court in Pulley v. HarrisSearch
-
the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals had failed to subject his death sentence to any proportionality review. See Autry v. EstelleSearch
-
including Williams' own challenge to that review in his petition for certiorari on his first federal habeas. Williams v. MaggioSearch
-
See Williams v. KingSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial