Citation network
Hutto Vs. Davis
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 11, 1982
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 370 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Hutto v. DavisSearch
-
U.S. 370 (1982) Hutto v. DavisSearch
-
prior affirmance had been vacated by this Court and the case had been remanded for reconsideration in light of Rummel v. EstelleSearch
-
and prison terms of not less than 5 nor more than 40 years for each of respondent's offenses. Davis v. DavisSearch
-
by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. The District Court, relying primarily upon the four factors set forth in Hart v. CoinerSearch
-
Davis v. ZahradnickSearch
-
a writ of habeas corpus. A panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed. Davis v. DavisSearch
-
affirmed the award of habeas relief. Davis v. DavisSearch
-
the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remanded the case for reconsideration in light of our decision in Rummel v. EstelleSearch
-
U. S. 263 (1980). Sub nom. Hutto v. DavisSearch
-
U.S. 947 (1980). The Court of Appeals again affirmed the District Court, this time by an equally divided vote. Davis v. DavisSearch
-
above, the District Court found respondent's sentence to be unconstitutional by applying the four-part test of Hart v. CoinerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
sold drugs to an inmate's wife who was alone with an infant child, and had himself been imprisoned in the past. Davis v. DavisSearch
-
to the offense. Nevertheless, for the reasons stated below, I reluctantly conclude that the Court's decision in Rummel v. EstelleSearch
-
Davis v. DavisSearch
-
This judgment was reversed on appeal, Davis v. DavisSearch
-
We remanded for reconsideration in light of our decision in Rummel v. EstelleSearch
-
II The sole authority upon which the Court today relies is its decision in Rummel v. EstelleSearch
-
comparisons -- that his sentences suffer from a greater degree of disproportionality than Rummel's did. Compare Davis v. ZahradnickSearch
-
Davis v. ZahranickSearch
-
E.g., Coker v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Weems v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 1233. Cf. Vines v. MuncySearch
-
evident than in this case. With the benefit of neither full briefing nor oral argument, the Court holds that Rummel v. EstelleSearch
-
in violation of the Eighth Amendment, as applied to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, see Robinson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
improper expansion of Rummel. Rummel acknowledged that prior decisions of this Court, see, e.g., Ingraham v. WrightSearch
-
See Coker v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Trop v. DullesSearch
-
The per curiam notes that the District Court applied the four-factor proportionality test of Hart v. CoinerSearch
-
the jury, which awarded the sentences, was unaware that the respondent had previously been convicted. See Davis v. DavisSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Hutto v. DavisSearch
-
of Rummel v. EstelleSearch
-
Hart v. CoinerSearch
-
of Hart v. CoinerSearch
-
Compare Davis v. ZahradnickSearch
-
Cf. Vines v. MuncySearch
-
Robinson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Ingraham v. WrightSearch
-
See Davis v. DavisSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial