Citation network
Cabell Vs. Chavez-salido
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 12, 1982
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 432 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Cabell v. Chavez-SalidoSearch
-
U.S. 432 (1982) Cabell v. Chavez-SalidoSearch
-
legally resident aliens serves political, and not economic, goals is to be evaluated in a two-step process. Sugarman v. DougallSearch
-
that the statutory citizenship requirement was unconstitutional both on its face and as applied. Chavez-Salido v. CabellSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
federal preemption claims. This Court vacated and remanded that judgment for further consideration in light of Foley v. ConnelieSearch
-
which upheld a New York statute requiring state troopers to be United States citizens. County of Los Angeles v. Chavez-SalidoSearch
-
On remand, the District Court reconsidered its previous position in light of both Foley, supra, and Ambach v. NorwickSearch
-
Over the years, this Court has many times considered state classifications dealing with aliens. See, e.g., Ambach v. NorwickSearch
-
Examining Board v. FloresSearch
-
Graham v. RichardsonSearch
-
Takahashi v. FishSearch
-
Crane v. NewSearch
-
to new contexts, and finally replaced when the distinctions they rely upon are no longer tenable. In Yick Wo v. HopkinsSearch
-
Court continued to uphold the right of the State to withhold from aliens public benefits and public resources. Terrace v. ThompsonSearch
-
market was clearly established as the principle by which state regulations of aliens were to be evaluated in Truax v. RaichSearch
-
doctrine, see Graham v. RichardsonSearch
-
supra, at 413 U. S. 643 , 413 U. S. 644 , was challenged in Takahashi v. FishSearch
-
analysis of state classifications of aliens, who are lawful residents, the distinction was further eroded in Graham v. RichardsonSearch
-
Sugarman v. PageSearch
-
that jurors, who act under a very specific set of instructions, could not be required to be citizens. See Perkins v. SmithSearch
-
the complaint was filed before this Court's decision in Monell v. NewSearch
-
has the power to prescribe the qualifications of its officers and the manner in which they shall be chosen.' Boyd v. NebraskaSearch
-
ex rel. Thayer, 143 U. S. 135 , 143 U. S. 161 (1892). See Luther v. BordenSearch
-
by virtue of its obligation, already noted above, 'to preserve the basic conception of a political community.' Dunn v. BlumsteinSearch
-
citizenship is relevant to the political community are not easily defined, but our cases since Sugarman -- Foley v. ConnelieSearch
-
U. S. 291 (1978), and Ambach v. NorwickSearch
-
cases and under which litigants may assert the rights of others not presently before the court. See Broadrick v. OklahomaSearch
-
Ante at 454 U. S. 440 , quoting Sugarman v. DougallSearch
-
against permanent resident aliens have formed a pattern. Ante at 454 U. S. 436 . Since Yick Wo v. HopkinsSearch
-
a lawfully admitted permanent resident alien to work for a living in the common occupations of the community. In Truax v. RaichSearch
-
In Sugarman v. DougallSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Cabell v. Chavez-SalidoSearch
-
Chavez-Salido v. CabellSearch
-
of Foley v. ConnelieSearch
-
County of Los Angeles v. Chavez-SalidoSearch
-
and Ambach v. NorwickSearch
-
In Yick Wo v. HopkinsSearch
-
Terrace v. ThompsonSearch
-
See Perkins v. SmithSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial