Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Lee

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 23, 1982

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

34 entries 6 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. WisconsIn Vs. Yoder US Supreme Court · May 15, 1972
  2. Sherbert Vs. Verner US Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1963
  3. Murdock Vs. Pennsylvania US Supreme Court · May 03, 1943
  4. Braunfeld Vs. Brown US Supreme Court · May 29, 1961
  5. Prince Vs. Massachusetts US Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1944
  6. Jacobson Vs. Massachusetts US Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1905
  7. U.S. 252 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Lee
    Search
  8. U.S. 252 (1982) United States v. Lee
    Search
  9. security system with myriad exceptions flowing from a wide variety of religious beliefs such as the Amish. Wisconsin v. Yoder
    Search
  10. Thomas v. Review
    Search
  11. however, and not the end, of the inquiry. Not all burdens on religion are unconstitutional. See, e.g., Prince v. Massachusetts
    Search
  12. Reynolds v. United
    Search
  13. Gillette v. United
    Search
  14. accommodating the Amish belief will unduly interfere with fulfillment of the governmental interest. In Braunfeld v. Brown
    Search
  15. Unlike the situation presented in Wisconsin v. Yoder
    Search
  16. the tax system because tax payments were spent in a manner that violates their religious belief. See, e.g., Lull v. Commissioner
    Search
  17. Autenrieth v. Cullen
    Search
  18. to hear the appeal. See also United States v. American
    Search
  19. g). See also Henson v. Commissioner
    Search
  20. Follett v. Town
    Search
  21. explains most of this Court's holdings than does the standard articulated by the Court today. See, e.g., Gillette v. United
    Search
  22. States, 98 U. S. 145 (polygamy law). The principal exception is Wisconsin v. Yoder
    Search
  23. in collecting these social security taxes. There is also tension between this standard and the reasoning in Thomas v. Review
    Search
  24. Bd. of Indiana Employment Security Div., 450 U. S. 707 , and Sherbert v. Verner
    Search
  25. by a different standard than that appropriate for the enforcement of neutral laws of general applicability. Cf. Harris v. McRae
    Search
  26. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Lee
    Search
  27. the Amish. Wisconsin v. Yoder
    Search
  28. In Braunfeld v. Brown
    Search
  29. Lull v. Commissioner
    Search
  30. United States v. American
    Search
  31. Henson v. Commissioner
    Search
  32. Follett v. Town
    Search
  33. and Sherbert v. Verner
    Search
  34. Cf. Harris v. McRae
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial