Citation network
Havens Realty Corp. Vs. Coleman
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 24, 1982
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 363 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSearch
-
U.S. 363 (1982) Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSearch
-
determination of whether each of the respondents has standing to sue is guided by the decision in Gladstone, Realtors v. VillageSearch
-
Court -- appealed, and the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed and remanded for further proceedings. Cole v. HavensSearch
-
U. S. 227 , 300 U. S. 240 -241 (1937) (citations omitted). See Powell v. McCormackSearch
-
Our inquiry with respect to the standing issues raised in this case is guided by our decision in Gladstone, Realtors v. VillageSearch
-
supra, at 422 U. S. 500 , quoting Linda R. S. v. RichardSearch
-
D., 410 U. S. 614 , 410 U. S. 617 , n. 3 (1973). Accord, Sierra Club v. MortonSearch
-
Trafficante v. MetropolitanSearch
-
d). See Pierson v. RaySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
to truthful housing information caused by misrepresentations to the tester -- is a direct one. See Duke Power Co. v. CarolinaSearch
-
to petitioners' actions, the Art. III requirement of injury in fact is satisfied. Arlington Heights v. MetropolitanSearch
-
Taggart v. Weinacker'sSearch
-
Arlington Heights v. MetropolitanSearch
-
Housing Dev. Corp., 429 U.S. at 429 U. S. 261 (emphasis omitted), quoting Baker v. CarrSearch
-
constitutes far more than simply a setback to the organization's abstract social interests, see Sierra Club v. MortonSearch
-
a) are intended to keep stale claims out of the courts. See Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSearch
-
nature of the alleged violation, only undermines the broad remedial intent of Congress embodied in the Act, see Jones v. AlfredSearch
-
H. Mayer Co., 392 U. S. 409 , 392 U. S. 417 (1968). Cf. Zipes v. TransSearch
-
That determination is not before us, and we intimate no view as to its correctness. See Gladstone, Realtors v. VillageSearch
-
test for mootness, United States v. PhosphateSearch
-
Gladstone, Realtors v. VillageSearch
-
Similarly, in Trafficante v. MetropolitanSearch
-
recognized that organizations are entitled to sue on their own behalf for injuries they have sustained. E.g., Warth v. SeldinSearch
-
noneconomic interest in encouraging open housing does not affect the nature of the injury suffered, Arlington Heights v. MetropolitanSearch
-
See Fort v. WhiteSearch
-
Fed.Rule. Civ.Proc. 12(e). Page 455 U. S. 384 See United States v. SCRAPSearch
-
have recognized as a constitutional requirement of Art. III standing. See, e.g., Valley Forge Christian College v. AmericansSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSearch
-
Cole v. HavensSearch
-
See Powell v. McCormackSearch
-
Linda R. S. v. RichardSearch
-
Accord, Sierra Club v. MortonSearch
-
See Pierson v. RaySearch
-
See Duke Power Co. v. CarolinaSearch
-
Baker v. CarrSearch
-
See Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSearch
-
Jones v. AlfredSearch
-
Cf. Zipes v. TransSearch
-
See Gladstone, Realtors v. VillageSearch
-
United States v. PhosphateSearch
-
E.g., Warth v. SeldinSearch
-
See United States v. SCRAPSearch
-
Valley Forge Christian College v. AmericansSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial