Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Murphy Vs. Hunt

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 02, 1982

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

33 entries 7 linked 26 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Parole Comm'n Vs. Geraghty US Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1980
  2. Sosna Vs. Iowa US Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1975
  3. Broadrick Vs. Oklahoma US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1973
    Relied / Followed
  4. Pennsylvania Vs. Mimms US Supreme Court · Dec 05, 1977
  5. Powell Vs. Mccormack US Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1969
  6. WeinsteIn Vs. Bradford US Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1975
  7. GersteIn Vs. Pugh US Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1975
  8. U.S. 478 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Murphy v. Hunt
    Search
  9. U.S. 478 (1982) Murphy v. Hunt
    Search
  10. claim. Hunt v. Roth
    Search
  11. U. S. 388 , 445 U. S. 396 (1980), quoting Powell v. McCormack
    Search
  12. In Weinstein v. Bradford
    Search
  13. See Illinois Elections Bd. v. Socialist
    Search
  14. that the same controversy will recur involving the same complaining party. Weinstein v. Bradford
    Search
  15. does not encourage us to believe otherwise. Nor is Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart
    Search
  16. violates neither the Sixth, Eighth, nor Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. See Parker v. Roth
    Search
  17. stated in Weinstein. See also Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart
    Search
  18. Because the Court of Appeals found Hunt's denial of pretrial bail not moot under Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart
    Search
  19. or controversy, it has remanded the case to the lower court for consideration of the possibility of mootness. Vitek v. Jones
    Search
  20. Scott v. Kentucky
    Search
  21. Page 455 U. S. 488 Indiana Employment Security Div. v. Burney
    Search
  22. courts have the inherent power to consider the propriety of bail even without a specific authorizing statute. State v. Jensen
    Search
  23. exception. Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart
    Search
  24. Id. at 427 U. S. 546 .) Moreover, there is language in Gerstein v. Pugh
    Search
  25. Hunt a continuing stake in the resolution of this case. There is nothing novel in this approach. See, e.g., Sibron v. New
    Search
  26. U.S. Supreme Court Murphy v. Hunt
    Search
  27. Hunt v. Roth
    Search
  28. the United States Constitution. See Parker v. Roth
    Search
  29. Indiana Employment Security Div. v. Burney
    Search
  30. State v. Jensen
    Search
  31. Sibron v. New
    Search
  32. Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart
    Search
  33. Vitek v. Jones
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales