Citation network
Mcelroy Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 23, 1982
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
McElroy v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 455 U.S. 642 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court McElroy v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 455 U.S. 642 (1982) McElroy v. UnitedSearch
-
of the principle of lenity and construction Page 455 U. S. 643 in petitioner's favor. United States v. BassSearch
-
require federal prosecutors to prove that the securities had been forged before crossing state lines. In United States v. SheridanSearch
-
require the checks to have been forged before crossing the state line. For support, the petitioner cites United States v. BassSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
as this Court had been using it in Commerce Clause cases before 1919. As we observed in United States v. BramblettSearch
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
is coextensive with congressional authority under the Commerce Clause. See United States v. PoselliSearch
-
United States v. LudwigSearch
-
See Champion v. AmesSearch
-
quoting Coe v. ErrolSearch
-
Texas & N. O. R. Co. v. SabineSearch
-
The House Report on the Dyer Act cited Champion v. AmesSearch
-
define interstate commerce more broadly than merely as commerce crossing state lines, see, e.g., Champlain Realty Co. v. BrattleboroSearch
-
Pereira v. UnitedSearch
-
In United States v. OwensSearch
-
See United States v. HilyerSearch
-
United States v. SparrowSearch
-
construing similar federal statutes designed to combat theft in the channels of interstate commerce. In United States v. AjlounySearch
-
F.2d at 837. In Barfield v. UnitedSearch
-
F.2d at 939. See United States v. LambertSearch
-
provisions, arrive at the same result that we reach today. In United States v. TobinSearch
-
F.2d at 692. See United States v. LumanSearch
-
United States v. LicavoliSearch
-
United States v. GarberSearch
-
United States v. MaddoxSearch
-
United States v. HiscottSearch
-
United States v. GobleSearch
-
its proscription beyond the interstate transportation of stolen property. III Quoting from United States v. SheridanSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court McElroy v. UnitedSearch
-
In United States v. SheridanSearch
-
the Commerce Clause. See United States v. PoselliSearch
-
Champion v. AmesSearch
-
Pereira v. UnitedSearch
-
In United States v. AjlounySearch
-
In Barfield v. UnitedSearch
-
See United States v. LambertSearch
-
In United States v. TobinSearch
-
See United States v. LumanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial