Citation network
Lane Vs. Williams
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 23, 1982
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 624 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Lane v. WilliamsSearch
-
U.S. 624 (1982) Lane v. WilliamsSearch
-
Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and ordered Williams released from custody. United States ex rel. Williams v. MorrisSearch
-
affirmed that decision, 633 F.2d 71 (1980), and we granted the State's petition for certiorari. Sub nom. Franzen v. WilliamsSearch
-
from their convictions, as well as subject them to reconviction with a possibly greater sentence. Cf. North Carolina v. PearceSearch
-
U. S. 244 , 404 U. S. 248 . The Court of Appeals, relying on Carafas v. LaValleeSearch
-
Ibid. (quoting Fiswick v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 329 U. S. 211 , 329 U. S. 222 ). In Sibron v. NewSearch
-
employment prospects, or the sentence imposed in a future criminal proceeding, could be affected. Cf. People v. HaltermanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
In People v. WillisSearch
-
however, to that considered in Carafas v. LaValleeSearch
-
Cf. Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
Santobello v. NewSearch
-
moot even if the previous sentence had been served and the State indicated that it would not seek a retrial. Carafas v. LaValleeSearch
-
Sibron v. NewSearch
-
that such consequences exist. Id. at 392 U. S. 55 Page 455 U. S. 635 (discussing United States v. MorganSearch
-
U. S. 502 (1954), and Pollard v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 352 U. S. 354 (1957)). See also Carafas v. LaValleeSearch
-
to that of a defendant who seeks habeas corpus review to correct a sentence already served. See North Carolina v. RiceSearch
-
Had respondents served the allegedly void mandatory parole term without incident, I might agree that North Carolina v. RiceSearch
-
were found to have violated the conditions of their parole. Therefore, unlike the situation in North Carolina v. RiceSearch
-
was sufficient to support the verdict beyond a reasonable doubt and the matter was never retried. See, e.g., People v. ChellewSearch
-
Ill.App.3d 963, 313 N.E.2d 284 (1974). Cf. People v. WunnenbergSearch
-
of probation revocation is not rendered moot merely because the defendant has served his entire sentence. See People v. HaltermanSearch
-
respondents were ever again considered for parole. Mem. to Court of Appeals 5. See also United States ex rel. Howell v. WolffSearch
-
People v. WunnenbergSearch
-
People v. ChellewSearch
-
is not a prerequisite to holding that a habeas challenge to a criminal conviction is not moot. See, e.g., Sibron v. NewSearch
-
York, 392 U. S. 40 , 392 U. S. 54 -57 (1968) (discussing Fiswick v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. MorganSearch
-
Pollard v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Lane v. WilliamsSearch
-
Williams v. MorrisSearch
-
Franzen v. WilliamsSearch
-
Cf. North Carolina v. PearceSearch
-
Fiswick v. UnitedSearch
-
In Sibron v. NewSearch
-
Cf. People v. HaltermanSearch
-
and Pollard v. UnitedSearch
-
See North Carolina v. RiceSearch
-
Cf. People v. WunnenbergSearch
-
See People v. HaltermanSearch
-
Howell v. WolffSearch
-
People v. WunnenbergSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial