Citation network
Engle Vs. Isaac
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 05, 1982
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 107 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Engle v. IsaacSearch
-
U.S. 107 (1982) Engle v. IsaacSearch
-
defense of self-defense by a preponderance of the evidence. In 1976, however, the Ohio Supreme Court, in State v. RobinsonSearch
-
prisoner from obtaining adjudication of his constitutional claim in the state courts, and thus, as held in Wainwright v. SykesSearch
-
U. S. 137 . Page 456 U. S. 110 JUSTICE O'CONNOR delivered the opinion of the Court. In Wainwright v. SykesSearch
-
required criminal defendants to carry the burden of proving self-defense by a preponderance of the evidence. See State v. SeliskarSearch
-
Szalkai v. StateSearch
-
Silvus v. StateSearch
-
of self-defense, the state court ruled, the prosecutor must disprove self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. RobinsonSearch
-
A) to place the burden of proving absence of self-defense on the prosecution. See State v. RobinsonSearch
-
Page 456 U. S. 115 Ten months after Isaac's trial, the Ohio Supreme Court decided State v. RobinsonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
This default waived Isaac's claim. State v. GlarosSearch
-
State v. SloneSearch
-
On the same day, that court decided State v. HumphriesSearch
-
Ohio St.2d 95, 364 N.E.2d 1354 (1977), and State v. WilliamsSearch
-
rule. Since Hughes offered no explanation for his failure to object, and showed no actual prejudice, Wainwright v. SykesSearch
-
U. S. 72 (1977), barred him from asserting the claim. Hughes v. EngleSearch
-
See Fay v. NoiaSearch
-
U. S. 391 (1963). Although the court cited our opinion in Wainwright v. SykesSearch
-
burden Bell with proving self-defense, since it had not defined absence of self-defense as an element of murder. Bell v. PeriniSearch
-
was whether Bell was entitled to retroactive application of State v. RobinsonSearch
-
the District Court noted that this Court had sanctioned just this sort of limit on retroactivity. See Hankerson v. NorthSearch
-
Carolina, 432 U. S. 233 , 432 U. S. 244 , n. 8 (1977). Bell v. PeriniSearch
-
that State v. RobinsonSearch
-
Ohio trial court. Since he further failed to show either cause for or actual prejudice from the waiver, see Wainwright v. SykesSearch
-
supra, he could not present his claim in a federal habeas proceeding. Isaac v. EngleSearch
-
June 26, 1978). The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed all three District Court orders. In Isaac v. EngleSearch
-
F.2d 1129 (1980), a majority of the en banc court ruled that Wainwright v. SykesSearch
-
rights, but would have concentrated on the State's arbitrary refusal to extend the retroactive benefits of State v. RobinsonSearch
-
the District Court to release Bell and Hughes unless the State chose to retry them within a reasonable time. Bell v. PeriniSearch
-
Hughes v. EngleSearch
-
and Patterson v. NewSearch
-
defenses may depend, at least in part, on the manner in which the State defines the charged crime. Compare Mullaney v. WilburSearch
-
Patterson v. NewSearch
-
State v. CliftonSearch
-
A)(1) (1975), and unlawful, State v. SimonSearch
-
preserved this claim before the state courts and, if not, to inquire whether the principles articulated in Wainwright v. SykesSearch
-
to comply with Rule 30 is adequate, under Ohio law, to bar appellate consideration of an objection. See, e.g., State v. HumphriesSearch
-
State v. GordonSearch
-
E.2d 243 (1971). The Ohio Supreme Court has enforced this bar against the very due process argument raised here. State v. WilliamsSearch
-
Sanders v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 373 U. S. 1 , 373 U. S. 225 (1963) (dissenting opinion). See also Hankerson v. NorthSearch
-
sovereign power to punish offenders and their good faith attempts to honor constitutional rights. See Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
In Wainwright v. SykesSearch
-
In Sykes itself, for example, the prisoner alleged that the State had violated the rights guaranteed by Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
standard with a plain error inquiry. We rejected this argument when pressed by a federal prisoner, see United States v. FradySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial