Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Mills Vs. Habluetzel

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 05, 1982

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

49 entries 6 linked 43 unlinked
Show
  1. Lalli Vs. Lalli US Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1978
  2. Trimble Vs. Gordon US Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1977
  3. Gomez Vs. Perez US Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1973
  4. Mathews Vs. Lucas US Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1976
  5. Chase Securities Corp. Vs. Donaldson US Supreme Court · May 21, 1945
  6. Little Vs. Streater US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1981
  7. U.S. 91 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Mills v. Habluetzel
    Search
  8. U.S. 91 (1982) Mills v. Habluetzel
    Search
  9. for legitimate children to obtain paternal support must also grant that opportunity to illegitimate children, Gomez v. Perez
    Search
  10. Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits the State from denying that same right to illegitimate children. Gomez v. Perez
    Search
  11. regardless of whether the parent has custody of the child, Hooten v. Hooten
    Search
  12. no enforceable duty on the part of a natural father to support his illegitimate children. See Home of the Holy Infancy v. Kaska
    Search
  13. Lane v. Phillips
    Search
  14. Bjorgo v. Bjorgo
    Search
  15. even assert illegitimacy as a defense to Page 456 U. S. 93 prosecution for criminal nonsupport. See Curtin v. State
    Search
  16. children, and thereby take upon themselves the obligation of supporting those children. Texas Dept. of Human Resources v. Hernandez
    Search
  17. procedures for a paternity and support action on behalf of illegitimate children. Texas Dept. of Human Resources v. Hernandez
    Search
  18. Texas Dept. of Human Resources v. Delley
    Search
  19. not simply as a procedural limitation Page 456 U. S. 95 on that right. Texas Dept. of Human Resources v. Hernandez
    Search
  20. The Court of Civil Appeals, relying upon its decision in Texas Dept. of Human Resources v. Hernandez
    Search
  21. The Hernandez decision, in turn, relied upon the constitutional analysis in Texas Dept. of Human Resources v. Chapman
    Search
  22. only two witnesses. Indeed, the problems of proving paternity have been recognized repeatedly by this Court. Parham v. Hughes
    Search
  23. equal protection scrutiny to the extent they are substantially related to a legitimate state interest. See Lalli v. Lalli
    Search
  24. Barr, Inc., 415 F.Supp. 126, 128 (ED Tex.1976) (citations omitted). See also Mellinger v. City
    Search
  25. Brantley v. Phoenix
    Search
  26. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. State
    Search
  27. for Appellant 29. We previously have recognized that blood tests are highly probative in proving paternity, Little v. Streater
    Search
  28. and Trimble v. Gordon
    Search
  29. involved the right of illegitimate children to inherit from their natural fathers, while Mathews v. Lucas
    Search
  30. of the general principle which those cases have laid down. In Lucas, the Court expressly relied on Gomez v. Perez
    Search
  31. Weber v. Aetna
    Search
  32. Casualty & Surety Co., 406 U. S. 164 , 406 U. S. 175 (1972). See also Lalli v. Lalli
    Search
  33. Supp.1982). I As the Court notes, the response of the Texas Legislature to our opinion in Gomez v. Perez
    Search
  34. State v. Wood
    Search
  35. Wash.2d 97, 569 P.2d 1148, 1151 (1977). Texas Dept. of Human Resources v. Delley
    Search
  36. reducing the possibility that a defendant will be falsely accused of being the illegitimate child's father. In Little v. Streater
    Search
  37. See Simpson v. City
    Search
  38. for bringing a negligence action tolled during the plaintiff's minority). In Texas Dept. of Human Resources v. Hernandez
    Search
  39. U.S. Supreme Court Mills v. Habluetzel
    Search
  40. Hooten v. Hooten
    Search
  41. See Home of the Holy Infancy v. Kaska
    Search
  42. See Curtin v. State
    Search
  43. Texas Dept. of Human Resources v. Hernandez
    Search
  44. Texas Dept. of Human Resources v. Chapman
    Search
  45. Court. Parham v. Hughes
    Search
  46. See Lalli v. Lalli
    Search
  47. Mellinger v. City
    Search
  48. In Little v. Streater
    Search
  49. In Texas Dept. of Human Resources v. Hernandez
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial