Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Schweiker Vs. Mcclure

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 20, 1982

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

29 entries 3 linked 26 unlinked
Show
  1. Morrissey Vs. Brewer US Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1972
  2. Califano Vs. Yamasaki US Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1979
  3. Mathews Vs. Eldridge US Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1976
  4. U.S. 188 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Schweiker v. McClure
    Search
  5. U.S. 188 (1982) Schweiker v. McClure
    Search
  6. McClure v. Harris
    Search
  7. See United States v. Erika
    Search
  8. F.Supp. at 415. The court noted that Mathews v. Eldridge
    Search
  9. demands impartiality on the part of those who function in judicial or quasi-judicial capacities. E.g., Marshall v. Jerrico
    Search
  10. must start, however, from the presumption that the hearing officers who decide Part B claims are unbiased. See Withrow v. Larkin
    Search
  11. United States v. Morgan
    Search
  12. See Gibson Page 456 U. S. 196 v. Berryhill
    Search
  13. Ward v. Village
    Search
  14. quoting Offutt v. United
    Search
  15. the salaries of the hearing officers are paid by the Federal Government. Cf. Marshall Page 456 U. S. 197 v. Jerrico
    Search
  16. F.Supp. at 417. In reaching this conclusion, the District Court applied the familiar test prescribed in Mathews v. Eldridge
    Search
  17. Court recognized that hearing officer salaries are paid from a federal fund, and not the carrier's resources. McClure v. Harris
    Search
  18. quoting Dept. of HEW, Medicare Part B Carriers Manual, ch. XII, pp. 12-21, 12-29 (1980). Cf. Richardson v. Perales
    Search
  19. See generally 42 CFR part 405, subpart G (1980), as amended, 45 Fed.Reg. 73932-73933 (1980). See also United States v. Erika
    Search
  20. be attorneys. Our cases, however, make clear that due process does not make such a uniform requirement. See Vitek v. Jones
    Search
  21. U. S. 471 , 408 U. S. 486 , 408 U. S. 489 (1972). Cf. Goldberg v. Kelly
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court Schweiker v. McClure
    Search
  23. E.g., Marshall v. Jerrico
    Search
  24. See Withrow v. Larkin
    Search
  25. Offutt v. United
    Search
  26. Cf. Richardson v. Perales
    Search
  27. United States v. Erika
    Search
  28. See Vitek v. Jones
    Search
  29. Cf. Goldberg v. Kelly
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial