Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Zant Vs. Stephens

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 03, 1982

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

71 entries 3 linked 68 unlinked
Show
  1. Godfrey Vs. Georgia US Supreme Court · May 19, 1980
  2. Drake Vs. Zant US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1980
  3. Sandstrom Vs. Montana US Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1979
  4. U.S. 410 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Zant v. Stephens
    Search
  5. U.S. 410 (1982) Zant v. Stephens
    Search
  6. Stephens v. Hopper
    Search
  7. U.S. 991 (1978). The jury imposed the death penalty. On direct appeal, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed. Stephens v. State
    Search
  8. Ga. 259, 227 S.E.2d 261, cert. denied, 429 U.S. 986 (1976). On the authority of Arnold v. State
    Search
  9. Ga. at 261-262, 227 S.E.2d at 263. After exhausting his state postconviction remedies, Stephens v. Hopper
    Search
  10. modified, 648 F.2d 446 (1981). We granted the petition for certiorari. 454 U.S. 814. In Gregg v. Georgia
    Search
  11. the standards and procedures set forth therein promised to alleviate to a significant degree the concern of Furman v. Georgia
    Search
  12. was clarified in concrete cases that we confronted and addressed more specific constitutional challenges in Coker v. Georgia
    Search
  13. U. S. 584 (1977), Presnell v. Georgia
    Search
  14. U. S. 14 (1978), Green v. Georgia
    Search
  15. U. S. 95 (1979), and Godfrey v. Georgia
    Search
  16. Gates v. State
    Search
  17. conceive as a basis for the Georgia Supreme Court's position, might undermine the confidence we expressed in Gregg v. Georgia
    Search
  18. See Stevens v. State
    Search
  19. Green v. State
    Search
  20. Hamilton v. State
    Search
  21. Brooks v. State
    Search
  22. Gollis v. State
    Search
  23. Dampier v. State
    Search
  24. Burger v. State
    Search
  25. Stephens v. State
    Search
  26. assumptions about the meaning -- and the constitutionality -- of the Georgia Supreme Court's position. In Drake v. Zant
    Search
  27. sentences -- premised in part on the (b)(7) aggravating circumstance -- were imposed prior to our decision in Godfrey v. Georgia
    Search
  28. JUSTICE MARSHALL, with whom JUSTICE BRENNAN joins, dissenting. Six years ago, in Gregg v. Georgia
    Search
  29. instructed with respect to the very factors that save the Georgia statute from unconstitutionality. See Gregg v. Georgia
    Search
  30. cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Page 456 U. S. 418 Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Gregg v. Georgia
    Search
  31. of this case. In Furman v. Georgia
    Search
  32. has been established beyond a reasonable doubt, the jury is not required to impose the death penalty. See Bowen v. State
    Search
  33. Ga. 492, 246 S.E.2d 322 (1978). The jury's verdict to impose the death penalty must be unanimous. Miller v. State
    Search
  34. In Gregg v. Georgia
    Search
  35. Id. at 222 (first emphasis added). In Godfrey v. Georgia
    Search
  36. found by the jury, it is also undisputed that the State would be unable to impose the death sentence, see Arnold v. State
    Search
  37. Court determined that the evidence supported a finding of other statutory aggravating circumstances. Cf. Presnell v. Georgia
    Search
  38. See Stromberg v. Page
    Search
  39. the absence of an unconstitutional instruction. See, e.g., id. at 283 U. S. 367 -368. Accord, Bachellar v. Maryland
    Search
  40. Street v. New
    Search
  41. Yates v. United
    Search
  42. Woodson v. North
    Search
  43. Eddings v. Oklahoma
    Search
  44. prevent the death penalty from being wantonly and freakishly imposed. Gregg v. Georgia
    Search
  45. constitutional infirmity of respondent's sentence. This conclusion is compelled by this Court's decision in Sandstrom v. Montana
    Search
  46. other and against any mitigating circumstances, when deciding whether or not to impose the death penalty. Cf. Godfrey v. Georgia
    Search
  47. at 446 U. S. 428 -429. Certainly several Members of this Court have operated under this assumption. See Gregg v. Georgia
    Search
  48. See supra at 456 U. S. 423 . Furthermore, in Gregg v. Georgia
    Search
  49. Furman v. Georgia
    Search
  50. U.S. Supreme Court Zant v. Stephens
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial