Citation network
North Haven Bd. of Educ. Vs. Bell
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 17, 1982
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 512 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court North Haven Bd. of Educ. v. BellSearch
-
U.S. 512 (1982) North Haven Bd. of Educ. v. BellSearch
-
cases were consolidated on appeal, and the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed. North Haven Bd. of Ed. v. HufstedlerSearch
-
a). See Islesboro School Comm. v. CalifanoSearch
-
or forced to work under more adverse conditions than are her male colleagues. See Dougherty Cty. School System v. HarrisSearch
-
F.2d 735, 737-738 (CA5 1980), cert. pending sub nom. Bell v. DoughertySearch
-
Griffin v. BreckenridgeSearch
-
Jones v. AlfredSearch
-
Piedmont & Northern R. Co. v. ICCSearch
-
does extend to employees of educational institutions. See Andrus v. GloverSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Although the statements of one legislator made during debate may not be controlling, see, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSearch
-
enacted, Page 456 U. S. 527 are an authoritative guide to the statute's construction. See, e.g., FEA v. AlgonquinSearch
-
NLRB v. FruitSearch
-
Schwegman Bros. v. CalvertSearch
-
which was intended to ban discriminatory employment practices, prevailed for substantive reasons. See Gulf Oil Corp. v. CoppSearch
-
Schwegmann Bros. v. CalvertSearch
-
It is Congress' intention in 1972, not in 1964, that is of significance in interpreting Title IX. See Cannon v. UniversitySearch
-
be similar in language and objective, we must not fail to give effect to the differences between them. See Lorillard v. PonsSearch
-
employment, and it lends weight to the argument that coverage of employment discrimination was intended. See Sibbach v. WilsonSearch
-
Cannon v. UniversitySearch
-
U. S. 544 , 442 U. S. 554 , n. 10 (1979), quoting Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSearch
-
U. S. 469 , 310 U. S. 489 (1940). See also Cannon v. UniversitySearch
-
NLRB v. BellSearch
-
United State v. BerghSearch
-
and on which Title IX was modeled, has been interpreted as being program-specific. See Board of Public Instruction v. FinchSearch
-
and 902. Cf. Cannon v. UniversitySearch
-
that they 'are infected by a discriminatory environment . . .' Board of Public Instruction of Taylor County, Florida v. FinchSearch
-
See North Haven Bd. of Ed. v. HufstedlerSearch
-
denied both motions, rejecting Potz' contention that the judgment was inconsistent with this Court's opinion in Cannon v. UniversitySearch
-
Four Courts of Appeals and several District Courts have so held. See Seattle University v. HEWSearch
-
F.2d 992 (CA9), cert. granted sub nom. United States Dept. of Ed. v. SeattleSearch
-
Romeo Community Schools v. HEWSearch
-
Junior College Dist. of St. Louis v. CalifanoSearch
-
Isleboro School Comm. v. CalifanoSearch
-
Grove City College v. HarrisSearch
-
Kneeland v. BloomSearch
-
McCarthy v. BurkholderSearch
-
F.Supp. 41 (Kan.1978). But see Piascik v. ClevelandSearch
-
Museum of Art, 426 F.Supp. 779, 781, n. 1 (ND Ohio 1976). Cf. Dougherty Cty. School System v. HarrisSearch
-
F.2d 735 (CA5 1980), cert. pending sub nom. Bell v. DoughertySearch
-
particularly when it is longstanding, of the agency charged with the statute's administration. See, e.g., NLRB v. BellSearch
-
Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCCSearch
-
in effect, respondent Bell's changed view does not moot the litigation. See American Textile Mfrs. Institute, Inc. v. DonovanSearch
-
deference as the interpretation of the agency charged with Title IX's enforcement. See Southeastern Community College v. DavisSearch
-
choice. Moreover, even if alternative remedies are available and their existence is relevant, but cf. Cannon v. UniversitySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial