Citation network
California Vs. Texas
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 14, 1982
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 164 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court California v. TexasSearch
-
U.S. 164 (1982) California v. TexasSearch
-
was insufficient to satisfy the total amount of potential death tax claims by both States, are sufficient under Texas v. FloridaSearch
-
court, under the Federal Interpleader Act, to determine Hughes' domicile. However, this Court's decision in Cory v. WhiteSearch
-
California made in November, 1977. At that time, we denied leave to file. California Page 457 U. S. 165 v. TexasSearch
-
U. S. 601 (1978). Following the suggestion of four Justices who concurred in California v. TexasSearch
-
in Federal District Court. This motion for leave to file a complaint accompanied the petition for certiorari in Cory v. WhiteSearch
-
Federal Interpleader Act provided a jurisdictional basis for resolving the dispute. We granted certiorari in Cory v. WhiteSearch
-
We reached that decision because the suit is barred by the Eleventh Amendment under Worcester County Trust Co. v. RileySearch
-
will further deplete the estate. Although these allegations have not been proved, they are sufficient under Texas v. FloridaSearch
-
In Texas v. FloridaSearch
-
now before us are indistinguishable in all material respects from those on which jurisdiction was based in Texas v. FloridaSearch
-
prudential and equitable limitations upon the exercise of our original jurisdiction. As we explained in Illinois v. CitySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
At the time we decided California v. TexasSearch
-
U.S. at 437 U. S. 601 -602. Our decision in Cory v. WhiteSearch
-
not a justiciable case or controversy. We conclude that our original jurisdiction is properly invoked under Texas v. FloridaSearch
-
Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File 6, quoting Alabama v. ArizonaSearch
-
fully satisfy all potential death tax claims against it even under California's own valuation. The Court in Texas v. FloridaSearch
-
a). Despite the suggestion that we do so, we decline to overrule Texas v. FloridaSearch
-
As in Texas v. FloridaSearch
-
The administrator of Hughes' estate timely perfected an appeal of that judgment. Brief for Respondent Lummis in Cory v. WhiteSearch
-
Justice Powell, With Whom Justice Marshall, Justice Rehnquist, and Justice Stevens Join, Dissenting. in Cory V. WhiteSearch
-
ante at 457 U. S. 89 , the Court today reaffirms the holding of Worcester County Trust Co. v. RileySearch
-
to satisfy both claims. Yet it is no more clear today than it was in 1978, when we unanimously decided California v. TexasSearch
-
ante at 457 U. S. 166 , n. 1, than those in Texas v. FloridaSearch
-
U. S. 398 (1939). Yet as Justice Stewart argued persuasively in our 1978 decision in California v. TexasSearch
-
supra, it is inescapable that Texas v. FloridaSearch
-
Simon v. EasternSearch
-
Kentucky Welfare Rights Org., 426 U. S. 26 , 426 U. S. 39 (1976). See Valley Forge Christian College v. AmericansSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court California v. TexasSearch
-
Texas v. FloridaSearch
-
Cory v. WhiteSearch
-
Illinois v. CitySearch
-
Alabama v. ArizonaSearch
-
In Cory v. WhiteSearch
-
of Worcester County Trust Co. v. RileySearch
-
See Valley Forge Christian College v. AmericansSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial