Citation network
General Tel. Co. Vs. Falcon
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 14, 1982
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 147 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court General Tel. Co. v. FalconSearch
-
U.S. 147 (1982) General Telephone Company of the Southwest v. FalconSearch
-
of Appeals' judgment and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. BurdineSearch
-
General Telephone Co. v. EEOCSearch
-
American Pipe Construction Co. v. UtahSearch
-
of his national origin, and that petitioner's promotion policy operated against Mexican-Americans as a class. Falcon v. GeneralSearch
-
by the ruling of the Page 457 U. S. 152 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Johnson v. GeorgiaSearch
-
The court relied on Payne v. PageSearch
-
Page 457 U. S. 155 After this Court decided Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. BurdineSearch
-
Court of Appeals and directed further consideration in the light of that opinion. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSearch
-
or applicants for employment without complying with the strictures of Rule 23. General Telephone Co. of Northwest v. EEOCSearch
-
East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSearch
-
U. S. 395 , 431 U. S. 403 (quoting Schlesinger v. ReservistsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the named plaintiff's plea that he is a proper class representative under Rule 23(a). As we noted in Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySearch
-
Id. at 437 U. S. 469 (quoting Mercantile Nat. Bank v. LangdeauSearch
-
of the Fifth Circuit panel that announced the across-the-board rule. In a specially concurring opinion in Johnson v. GeorgiaSearch
-
s divisions conducted its own hiring and since management of the broader class would be much more difficult. Falcon v. GeneralSearch
-
Appeals held that respondent had made out a prima facie case under the test set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSearch
-
facie case was not clearly erroneous. In so holding, the Court of Appeals relied on its earlier opinion in Burdine v. TexasSearch
-
See Hall v. WerthanSearch
-
of Mexican-American employees will decrease respondent's chances for promotion. See General Telephone Co. of Northwest v. EEOCSearch
-
East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSearch
-
is to promote judicial economy by allowing for litigation of common questions of law and fact at one time. Califano v. YamasakiSearch
-
in employment discrimination cases. East Texas Motor Freight System, Page 457 U. S. 162 Inc. v. RodriguezSearch
-
Ante at 457 U. S. 156 , quoting General Telephone Co. of Northwest v. EEOCSearch
-
Mexican-American. Falcon v. GeneralSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court General Tel. Co. v. FalconSearch
-
General Telephone Company of the Southwest v. FalconSearch
-
of Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. BurdineSearch
-
Falcon v. GeneralSearch
-
Johnson v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Payne v. PageSearch
-
Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. BurdineSearch
-
General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSearch
-
General Telephone Co. of Northwest v. EEOCSearch
-
Schlesinger v. ReservistsSearch
-
Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySearch
-
Mercantile Nat. Bank v. LangdeauSearch
-
Burdine v. TexasSearch
-
See General Telephone Co. of Northwest v. EEOCSearch
-
Inc. v. RodriguezSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial