Citation network
Zobel Vs. Williams
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 14, 1982
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 55 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Zobel v. WilliamsSearch
-
U.S. 55 (1982) Zobel v. WilliamsSearch
-
increasing number of classes of concededly bona fide residents based on how long they have lived in the State. Sosna v. IowaSearch
-
Memorial Hospital v. MaricopaSearch
-
and Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
The Alaska dividend distribution law is quite unlike the durational residency requirements we examined in Sosna v. IowaSearch
-
law should be subjected to the higher level of scrutiny applied to the durational residency requirements in Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
supra, and Memorial Hospital v. MaricopaSearch
-
argument was made and rejected in Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
Emphasis added.) Similarly, in Vlandis v. KlineSearch
-
it is evident that the legislature would not have enacted the legislation without the invalid portion. Buckley v. PageSearch
-
United States v. JacksonSearch
-
Champlin Refining Co. v. CorporationSearch
-
is constitutionally unacceptable. Vlandis v. KlineSearch
-
Court, again by a 3-2 vote, held that this statute violated the State Constitution's equal protection clause. Williams v. ZobelSearch
-
durational residency cases, we examined state laws which imposed waiting periods on access to divorce courts, Sosna v. IowaSearch
-
eligibility for free nonemergency medical care, Memorial Hospital v. MaricopaSearch
-
voting rights, Dunn v. BlumsteinSearch
-
and welfare assistance, Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
only against those who have recently exercised the right to travel, as did the statute involved in Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
to another has long been accepted, yet both the nature and the source of that right have remained obscure. See Jones v. HelmsSearch
-
in equal protection terms, state distinctions between newcomers and longer term residents. See Memorial Hospital v. MaricopaSearch
-
to inhibit migration into the State without encountering insurmountable constitutional difficulties. See Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
See Memorial Hospital v. MaricopaSearch
-
Starns v. MalkersonSearch
-
by this Court is not to be read as an adoption of the reasoning supporting the judgment under review. Fusari v. SteinbergSearch
-
U. S. 379 , 419 U. S. 391 (1975) (concurring opinion). See also Colorado Springs Amusements, Ltd. v. RizzoSearch
-
U. S. 651 , 415 U. S. 671 (1974). Moreover, as we pointed out in Vlandis v. KlineSearch
-
of Art. IV. But equally plausible, I think, is the argument that the right resides in the Commerce Clause, see Edwards v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Id. at 394 U. S. 630 -631, quoting United States v. GuestSearch
-
it reflects not the structure of the Federal Union, but the idea of constitutionally protected equality. See Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
and attachment may bear some rational relationship to a very limited number of legitimate state purposes. Cf. Chimento v. StarkSearch
-
our cases leave no doubt that it will trigger intensified equal protection scrutiny. See, e.g., Memorial Hospital v. MaricopaSearch
-
Equal Protection Clause itself, however, declares this objective illegitimate. Instead, as a full reading of Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
U. S. 618 (1969), and Vlandis v. KlineSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Zobel v. WilliamsSearch
-
the State. Sosna v. IowaSearch
-
and Memorial Hospital v. MaricopaSearch
-
Buckley v. PageSearch
-
Williams v. ZobelSearch
-
See Jones v. HelmsSearch
-
See Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial