Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Johnson

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 21, 1982

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

69 entries 9 linked 60 unlinked
Show
  1. Robinson Vs. Neil US Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1973
  2. Fahy Vs. Connecticut US Supreme Court · Dec 02, 1963
  3. Stovall Vs. Denno US Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1967
  4. Gosa Vs. Mayden US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1973
  5. Destefano Vs. Woods US Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1968
    Relied / Followed
  6. Michigan Vs. Payne US Supreme Court · May 21, 1973
  7. United States Vs. Peltier US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1975
  8. Morrissey Vs. Brewer US Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1972
    Relied / Followed
  9. Jenkins Vs. Delaware US Supreme Court · Jun 02, 1969
  10. U.S. 537 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Johnson
    Search
  11. U.S. 537 (1981) United States v. Johnson
    Search
  12. Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Syllabus Payton V. New
    Search
  13. of decisionmaking consonant with this Court's original understanding in Linkletter Page 457 U. S. 538 v. Walker
    Search
  14. U. S. 618 , and Tehan v. United
    Search
  15. Desist v. United
    Search
  16. Mackey v. United
    Search
  17. Pp. 457 U. S. 554 -556. (c) There is no merit to the Government's arguments, based on United States v. Peltier
    Search
  18. joined, post, p. 457 U. S. 564 . JUSTICE BLACKMUN delivered the opinion of the Court. In Payton v. New
    Search
  19. while respondent's petition for rehearing was still pending before the Ninth Circuit, this Court decided Payton v. New
    Search
  20. of retrospectivity. Great Northern R. Co. v. Sunburst
    Search
  21. Refining Co., 287 U. S. 358 , 287 U. S. 364 (1932). Before 1965, when this Court decided Linkletter v. Walker
    Search
  22. U. S. 505 , 409 U. S. 507 (1973), citing Norton v. Shelby
    Search
  23. County, 118 U. S. 425 , 118 U. S. 442 (1886), and Chicot County Drainage Dist. v. Baxter
    Search
  24. Linkletter itself addressed the question whether the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule of Mapp v. Ohio
    Search
  25. Page 457 U. S. 543 benefit of Mapp's rule. See 381 U.S. at 381 U. S. 622 , n. 4, citing Ker v. California
    Search
  26. and Stoner v. California
    Search
  27. U.S. at 381 U. S. 627 , citing United States v. Schooner
    Search
  28. should not apply to convictions that had become final before Mapp was decided. The following Term, in Tehan v. United
    Search
  29. U. S. 406 (1966), the Court applied Linkletter's analysis to hold the Fifth Amendment rule of Griffin v. California
    Search
  30. U.S. at 382 U. S. 409 , n. 3, citing O'Connor v. Ohio
    Search
  31. apply retrospectively at least to judgments of conviction not yet final when the rule was established. In Johnson v. New
    Search
  32. Jersey, 384 U. S. 719 (1966), and Stovall v. Denno
    Search
  33. Id. at 388 U. S. 297 . See also Johnson v. New
    Search
  34. U.S. at 388 U. S. 300 . See Johnson v. New
    Search
  35. Williams v. United
    Search
  36. Brown v. Louisiana
    Search
  37. Hankerson v. North
    Search
  38. only to future cases, denying the benefit of the new rule even to the parties before the Court. See, e.g., Morrissey v. Brewer
    Search
  39. Cf. Johnson v. New
    Search
  40. Jersey, 384 U.S. at 384 U. S. 733 , citing England Page 457 U. S. 545 v. Louisiana
    Search
  41. Board of Medical Examiners, 375 U. S. 411 (1964), and James v. United
    Search
  42. applied a change in the law to all future litigants, but retroactively only to the parties at bar. See, e.g., Stovall v. Denno
    Search
  43. Adam v. Illinois
    Search
  44. Page 457 U. S. 546 In Desist v. United
    Search
  45. States, 394 U. S. 244 , 394 U. S. 256 (1969) (dissenting opinion), and Mackey v. United
    Search
  46. Id. at 401 U. S. 676 , citing Jenkins v. Delaware
    Search
  47. States, 394 U.S. at 394 U. S. 258 . See also Michigan v. Payne
    Search
  48. Desist v. Page
    Search
  49. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Johnson
    Search
  50. and Tehan v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial