Citation network
Blue Shield of Virginia Vs. Mccready
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 21, 1982
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 465 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Blue Shield of Virginia v. McCreadySearch
-
U.S. 465 (1982) Blue Shield of Virginia v. McCreadySearch
-
respondent to proceed does not offer the slightest possibility of a duplicative exaction from petitioners, Hawaii v. StandardSearch
-
Oil Co., 405 U. S. 251 , and Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSearch
-
Brunswick Corp. v. PuebloSearch
-
emphasis added). As we noted in Reiter v. SonotoneSearch
-
of their illegal actions, and would provide ample compensation to the victims of antitrust violations. Pfizer Inc. v. IndiaSearch
-
U. S. 308 , 434 U. S. 313 314 (1978). See Brunswick Corp. v. PuebloSearch
-
Perma Mufflers, Inc. v. InternationalSearch
-
American Society of Mechanical Engineers v. HydrolevelSearch
-
Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. AmericanSearch
-
Page 457 U. S. 473 Two recent cases illustrate the point. Pfizer Inc. v. IndiaSearch
-
U. S. 312 , and held that it extends even to an action brought by a foreign sovereign. Similarly, Reiter v. SonotoneSearch
-
A In Hawaii v. StandardSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
for injury to the State's quasi-sovereign interests. Id. at 405 U. S. 264 . See Reiter v. SonotoneSearch
-
Corp., supra, at 442 U. S. 342 . In Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSearch
-
U. S. 720 (1977), similar concerns prevailed. Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
damages from the antitrust violator measured by the amount that had been passed on to it. Relying in part on Hawaii v. StandardSearch
-
See Perkins v. StandardSearch
-
Karseal Corp. v. RichfieldSearch
-
Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., 429 U.S. at 429 U. S. 489 , quoting Zenith Radio Corp. v. HazeltineSearch
-
In promoting this argument, petitioners rely heavily on language in Brunswick Corp. v. PuebloSearch
-
Page 457 U. S. 482 Id. at 429 U. S. 487 -488, quoting Wyandotte Transportation Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
should, in short, be 'the type of loss that the claimed violations . . . would be likely to cause.' Zenith Radio Corp. v. HazeltineSearch
-
potentially Page 457 U. S. 483 offers redress, see Reiter v. SonotoneSearch
-
Blue Shield to pay for services rendered by licensed psychologists. See Virginia Academy of Clinical Psychologists v. BlueSearch
-
read consistently with that statute, at least until that statute was held invalid as applied in Blue Cross of Virginia v. CommonwealthSearch
-
Following trial, the District Court entered judgment for the defendants, Virginia Academy of Clinical Psychologists v. BlueSearch
-
Radovich v. NationalSearch
-
Football League, 352 U. S. 445 , 352 U. S. 454 (1957). See also Radiant Burners, Inc. v. PeoplesSearch
-
can the deterrent objectives of the antitrust laws be fully served. Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
Shoe Machinery Corp., 392 U. S. 481 , 392 U. S. 494 (1968). See Pfizer Inc. v. IndiaSearch
-
the consequence would be to discourage vigorous enforcement of the antitrust laws by private suits. Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
claims is not lightly to be imposed upon potential antitrust litigants, or upon the judicial system. See Hawaii v. StandardSearch
-
Bigelow v. RKOSearch
-
to consider whether a claim rests at bottom on some abstract conception or speculative measure of harm. See Hawaii v. StandardSearch
-
in Perkins v. StandardSearch
-
of the injury, e.g., Loeb v. EastmanSearch
-
Productive Inventions, Inc. v. TricoSearch
-
Volasco Products Co. v. LloydSearch
-
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. GoldwynSearch
-
Malamud v. SinclairSearch
-
Bravman v. BassetSearch
-
to describe those injuries that will find no remedy at law. See, e.g., South Carolina Council of Milk Producers, Inc. v. NewtonSearch
-
terms only emphasizes that the principle of proximate cause is hardly a rigorous analytic tool. See, e.g., Palsgraf v. LongSearch
-
remedy, legislative intent is the controlling consideration. Cf. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Blue Shield of Virginia v. McCreadySearch
-
Hawaii v. StandardSearch
-
and Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial