Citation network
Middlesex County Ethics Comm. Vs. Bar Assn.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 21, 1982
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
- Distinguished
-
Middlesex County Ethics Comm. v. BarSearch
-
Assn. - 457 U.S. 423 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Middlesex County Ethics Comm. v. BarSearch
-
Assn., 457 U.S. 423 (1982) Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. GardenSearch
-
under the Federal Constitution. The court dismissed the complaint on the basis of the abstention principles of Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
of the New Jersey Supreme Court. 454 U.S. 962 (1981). The Court of Appeals held that it need not abstain under Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
rules were facially vague and overbroad. The District Court granted petitioner's motion to dismiss based on Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
or other extraordinary circumstance which would constitute an exception to Younger abstention. Dombrowski v. PfisterSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
II A Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
Younger are fully applicable to noncriminal judicial proceedings when important state interests are involved. Moore v. SimsSearch
-
Huffman v. PursueSearch
-
the functioning of the state judicial system also evidence the state's substantial interest in the litigation. Trainor v. HernandezSearch
-
Id. at 442 U. S. 430 . See also Gibson v. BerryhillSearch
-
Toft v. KetchumSearch
-
U.S. at 401 U. S. 45 , quoting Fenner v. BoykinSearch
-
There is no reason for the federal courts to ignore this subsequent development. In Hicks v. MirandaSearch
-
but before any proceedings of substance on the merits have taken place in federal court, the principles of Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
unconstitutional. Younger, supra, at 401 U. S. 53 , quoting Watson v. BuckSearch
-
adjudicated. No formal opinion is filed by the District Ethics Committee. The Third Circuit distinguished Gipson v. NewSearch
-
Samuel v. MackellSearch
-
Proposed Draft 1978). As recognized in Juidice v. VailSearch
-
role of local ethics or bar association committees may be analogized to the function of a special master. Anonymous v. AssociationSearch
-
judicial nature of disciplinary actions in New Jersey has been recognized previously by the federal courts. In Gipson v. NewSearch
-
This case is distinguishable from Steffel v. ThompsonSearch
-
for vindicating the constitutional rights of the federal plaintiff. This case is also distinguishable from Gerstein v. PughSearch
-
of the legality of a pretrial detention could not be raised in defense of a criminal prosecution. See also Juidice v. VailSearch
-
U. S. 544 , 390 U. S. 551 (1968), call for exceptional deference by the federal courts. See Gipson v. NewSearch
-
Erdmann v. StevensSearch
-
F.2d 1205, 1209-1210 (CA2 1972). I continue to adhere to my view, however, that Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
U. S. 37 (1971), is in general inapplicable to civil proceedings. See Huffman v. PursueSearch
-
constitutional challenges, Younger is inapplicable. Ante at 457 U. S. 432 . See also Gibson v. BerryhillSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Middlesex County Ethics Comm. v. BarSearch
-
Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. GardenSearch
-
of Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
Moore v. SimsSearch
-
In Hicks v. MirandaSearch
-
Gipson v. NewSearch
-
Anonymous v. AssociationSearch
-
In Gipson v. NewSearch
-
Steffel v. ThompsonSearch
-
See Gipson v. NewSearch
-
See Huffman v. PursueSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial