Citation network
Clements Vs. Fashing
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 25, 1982
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 957 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Clements v. FashingSearch
-
U.S. 957 (1982) Clements v. FashingSearch
-
a far more limited restriction on political activity than has been upheld with regard to civil servants. Cf. CSC v. LetterSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
if his current term of office will not expire until after the legislative term to which he aspires begins. Lee v. DanielsSearch
-
denied appellees equal protection. Fashing v. MooreSearch
-
while others were not. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed without opinion. Fashing v. MooreSearch
-
not a justiciable controversy within the meaning of Art. III of the United States Constitution. United Public Workers v. MitchellSearch
-
to the pursuit of the State's goals, and only if no grounds can be conceived to justify them. See, e.g., McDonald v. BoardSearch
-
San Antonio Independent School Dist. v. RodriguezSearch
-
impose burdens on new or small political parties or independent candidates. See, e.g., Illinois State Bd. of Elections v. SocialistSearch
-
of support requirements and classifications that turn on the political party's success in prior elections. See Storer v. BrownSearch
-
virtually impossible for any but the two major parties to achieve ballot positions for their candidates. See Williams v. RhodesSearch
-
of the interests that are affected and the extent of the burden these provisions place on candidacy. See Bullock v. CarterSearch
-
principles to uphold a classification scheme that denied absentee ballots to inmates in jail awaiting trial. McDonald v. BoardSearch
-
which are invidious, arbitrary, or irrational offend the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution. Williamson v. LeeSearch
-
is hardly a significant barrier to candidacy. In Storer v. BrownSearch
-
Similarly, we upheld a 7-year durational residency requirement for candidacy Page 457 U. S. 968 in Chimento v. StarkSearch
-
predicate in order to survive a challenge under the Equal Protection Clause. See Illinois State Bd. of Elections v. SocialistSearch
-
because the State could have selected another means of achieving the desired ends. Massachusetts Bd. of Retirement v. MurgiaSearch
-
is invalid because it burdens only those officeholders who desire to run for the legislature. In Broadrick v. OklahomaSearch
-
positions require restrictions on partisan political activities and which may be left unregulated. See McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
Williamson v. LeeSearch
-
McDonald v. BoardSearch
-
not the sort of malfunctioning of the State's lawmaking process forbidden by the Equal Protection Clause. See McDonald v. BoardSearch
-
A regulation is not devoid of a rational predicate simply because it happens to be incomplete. See Williamson v. LeeSearch
-
candidacy for another elected office unless and until it places similar restrictions on other officeholders. Broadrick v. OklahomaSearch
-
U.S. at 413 U. S. 607 , n. 5. Cf. Minnesota v. CloverSearch
-
a far more limited restriction on political activity than this Court has upheld with regard to civil servants. See CSC v. LetterSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Clements v. FashingSearch
-
Cf. CSC v. LetterSearch
-
Lee v. DanielsSearch
-
Fashing v. MooreSearch
-
of Art. III of the United States Constitution. United Public Workers v. MitchellSearch
-
Illinois State Bd. of Elections v. SocialistSearch
-
See Storer v. BrownSearch
-
See Williams v. RhodesSearch
-
See Bullock v. CarterSearch
-
the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution. Williamson v. LeeSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial