Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Rendell-baker Vs. Kohn

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 25, 1982

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

63 entries 10 linked 53 unlinked
Show
  1. Shelley Vs. Kraemer US Supreme Court · May 03, 1948
  2. Moose Lodge No. 107 Vs. Irvis US Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1972
  3. Smith Vs. Allwright US Supreme Court · Apr 03, 1944
  4. Terry Vs. Adams US Supreme Court · May 04, 1953
  5. WisconsIn Vs. Yoder US Supreme Court · May 15, 1972
  6. Meyer Vs. Nebraska US Supreme Court · Jun 04, 1923
  7. Shelton Vs. Tucker US Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1960
  8. United States Vs. Classic US Supreme Court · May 26, 1941
  9. Blum Vs. Yaretsky US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1982
  10. Polk County Vs. Dodson US Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1981
  11. U.S. 830 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Rendell-Baker v. Kohn
    Search
  12. U.S. 830 (1982) Rendell-Baker v. Kohn
    Search
  13. b) The school's receipt of public funds does not make the discharge decisions acts of the State. Cf. Blum v. Yaretsky
    Search
  14. between the school and the State. Burton v. Wilmington
    Search
  15. quoting Jackson v. Metropolitan
    Search
  16. adolescents with drug, alcohol, or emotional problems. The District Court, following the guidelines of Burton v. Wilmington
    Search
  17. the Fourteenth Amendment, prohibits interference with federal rights under color of state law. In United States v. Price
    Search
  18. required under the Fourteenth Amendment. See also United States v. Classic
    Search
  19. Lugar v. Edmondson
    Search
  20. action of the respondent school is not state action, our inquiry ends. Page 457 U. S. 839 B In Blum v. Yaretsky
    Search
  21. homes were privately owned and operated. Post at 457 U. S. 1003 . Relying on Flagg Brothers, Inc. v. Brooks
    Search
  22. Jackson v. Metropolitan
    Search
  23. from government funding was the strongest factor to support a claim of state action. 641 F.2d at 24. But in Blum v. Yaretsky
    Search
  24. public contracts. The school is also analogous to the public defender found not to be a state actor in Polk County v. Dodson
    Search
  25. counselors is not changed because the State pays the tuition of the students. A second factor considered in Blum v. Yaretsky
    Search
  26. quoted in Blum v. Yaretsky
    Search
  27. between the school and the State similar to the relationship involved in Burton v. Wilmington
    Search
  28. Parking Authority, 365 U. S. 715 (1961). Such a claim is rejected in Blum v. Yaretsky
    Search
  29. with the sheriff, a state actor, in depriving the white teacher of federal rights. Similarly, Flagg Brothers, Inc. v. Brooks
    Search
  30. by a sham arrangement which attempts to disguise provision of public services as acts of private parties. Cf. Evans v. Newton
    Search
  31. The issue in Blum v. Yaretsky
    Search
  32. that the transfer or discharge is made on the basis of some rule of decision for which the State is responsible. Lugar v. Edmondson
    Search
  33. with which I agree. Page 457 U. S. 844 Similarly, the allegations of the petitioners in Rendell-Baker v. Kohn
    Search
  34. This opinion applies also to No. 81952, Blum, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al. v. Yaretsky
    Search
  35. that it can be regarded as governmental action. Evans v. Newton
    Search
  36. See Burton v. Wilmington
    Search
  37. Jackson v. Metropolitan
    Search
  38. it ranks at the very apex of the function of a State. Ambach v. Norwick
    Search
  39. Jackson, supra, at 419 U. S. 353 . See Marsh v. Alabama
    Search
  40. with other factors demonstrating a close connection with the State, may justify a finding of state action. Cf. Evans v. Newton
    Search
  41. Under these circumstances, it is entirely appropriate to treat the entity as an arm of the State. Cf. Smith v. Allwright
    Search
  42. This Court has repeatedly recognized the unique role that education plays in American society. See Plyler v. Doe
    Search
  43. Abington School District v. Schempp
    Search
  44. State may not deliberately delegate a task to a private entity in order to avoid its constitutional obligations. Terry v. Adams
    Search
  45. has previously emphasized the close relationship between teachers' free speech and the educational process. See Givhan v. Western
    Search
  46. Pickering v. Board
    Search
  47. Keyshian v. Board
    Search
  48. U.S. Supreme Court Rendell-Baker v. Kohn
    Search
  49. of the State. Cf. Blum v. Yaretsky
    Search
  50. and the State. Burton v. Wilmington
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial