Citation network
Williams Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 29, 1982
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Williams v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 458 U.S. 279 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Williams v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 458 U.S. 279 (1982) Williams v. UnitedSearch
-
F.2d 1311, 1319 (CA5 1981). In line with its earlier decision in United States v. PayneSearch
-
Brief for United States 19. See United States v. PayneSearch
-
United States v. KrownSearch
-
loans, and neither of those two organizations accepted checks for deposit from private customers. See United States v. SabatinoSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 336 , 404 U. S. 347 (1971), quoting United States v. UniversalSearch
-
deposit of bad checks. United States v. EnmonsSearch
-
See United States v. SherSearch
-
does not proscribe check-kiting). Cf. United States v. KrownSearch
-
U. S. 576 , 452 U. S. 580 (1981) (quoting Consumer Product Safety Comm'n v. GTESearch
-
U. S. 294 deceptive schemes that might impair the financial stability of these institutions. Cf. United States v. NaftalinSearch
-
United States v. PintoSearch
-
F.2d 833, 838 (CA3) (quoting United States v. StoddartSearch
-
broad language does not lend itself to the restrictive interpretation endorsed by the Court today. Cf. United States v. CulbertSearch
-
to a particular kind of transaction. United States v. CulbertSearch
-
description. This method of statutory construction was Page 458 U. S. 295 rejected recently in Harrison v. PPGSearch
-
and thus violates the statute. See, e.g., United States v. GreeneSearch
-
See United States v. CalandrellaSearch
-
F.2d 236 (CA6), cert. denied sub nom. Kaye v. UnitedSearch
-
within the ordinary meaning of these terms. See, e.g., United States v. PayneSearch
-
United States v. StreetSearch
-
clear indications in the legislative history that Congress did not intend to proscribe this conduct. See United States v. TurketteSearch
-
be given its narrowest meaning by limiting its scope to effectuate only its primary purpose. See, e.g., United States v. TurketteSearch
-
United States v. MooreSearch
-
we addressed similar arguments raised by persons convicted under broad federal statutes. See, e.g., United States v. TurketteSearch
-
Rubin v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. TurketteSearch
-
to give it a meaning contradictory to the fair import of the whole remaining language. As was said in United States v. GaskinSearch
-
United States v. BrownSearch
-
U. S. 18 , 333 U. S. 25 -26 (1948) (quoted in United States v. TurketteSearch
-
supra, at 452 U. S. 588 , n. 10, and United States v. MooreSearch
-
that, in this case, none of the general justifications for applying the rule of lenity are present. In Huddleston v. UnitedSearch
-
that check-kiting is subject to federal prosecution under the mail and wire fraud statutes, see, e.g., United States v. GiordanoSearch
-
United States v. ConstantSearch
-
is consistent with this scheme. See, e.g., United States v. BushSearch
-
United States v. StoddartSearch
-
Rather, it complements state law enforcement in an area where the federal interest is substantial. See United States v. TurketteSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Williams v. UnitedSearch
-
See United States v. PayneSearch
-
See United States v. SabatinoSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial