Citation network
Board of Educ. Vs. Mccluskey
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jul 02, 1982
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 966 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Board of Educ. v. McCluskeySearch
-
U.S. 966 (1982) Board of Education of Rogers, Arkansas v. McCluskeySearch
-
for drug use off school premises. In any event, federal courts are not authorized to construe school regulations, Wood v. StricklandSearch
-
F.2d at 1267. For this reason, the Court of Appeals concluded, Wood v. StricklandSearch
-
that federal courts were not authorized to construe school regulations, the Court of Appeals concluded that Wood v. StricklandSearch
-
had construed its regulations unreasonably. 662 F.2d at 1267. Judge McMillian dissented because he concluded that Wood v. StricklandSearch
-
from construing the school regulations involved in this case differently than the Board had construed them. Wood v. StricklandSearch
-
U. S. 326 (emphasis added). The Court of Appeals and the District Court plainly erred in distinguishing Wood v. StricklandSearch
-
in Wood v. StricklandSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
preferable to the Board's -- which they do not -- the Board's interpretation of its regulations controls under Wood v. StricklandSearch
-
Rowley v. BoardSearch
-
In this Term, see Duckworth v. SerranoSearch
-
Jago v. VanSearch
-
Cooper v. MitchellSearch
-
Wainwright v. TornaSearch
-
United States v. HollywoodSearch
-
Michigan v. ThomasSearch
-
ante p. 458 U. S. 259 . But see Boag v. MacDougallSearch
-
said that egregious error is presented only in cases in which prosecutors and wardens seek review. See, e.g., McKinney v. EstelleSearch
-
Tejeda-Mata v. INSSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Board of Educ. v. McCluskeySearch
-
Board of Education of Rogers, Arkansas v. McCluskeySearch
-
Wood v. StricklandSearch
-
Cooper v. MitchellSearch
-
McKinney v. EstelleSearch
-
Sumner v. MataSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial