Citation network
LarkIn Vs. Grendel's Den, Inc.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 13, 1982
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Larkin v. Grendel'sSearch
-
Den, Inc. - 459 U.S. 116 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Larkin v. Grendel'sSearch
-
Den, Inc., 459 U.S. 116 (1982) Larkin v. Grendel'sSearch
-
Lemon v. KurzmanSearch
-
Arno v. AlcoholicSearch
-
void on its face, Grendel's Den, Inc. v. GoodwinSearch
-
arguments, but held that the State's actions were not immune from antitrust review under the doctrine of Parker v. BrownSearch
-
Court on the Due Process and Establishment Clause arguments, but affirmed its antitrust analysis, Grendel's Den, Inc. v. GoodwinSearch
-
s judgment on Establishment Clause grounds without reaching the due process or antitrust claims, Grendel's Den, Inc. v. GoodwinSearch
-
id. at 104 (emphasis in original), quoting Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. NyquistSearch
-
theaters, see Young v. AmericanSearch
-
and in Grayned v. CitySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Arlington Heights v. MetropolitanSearch
-
Housing Dev. Corp., 429 U. S. 252 , 429 U. S. 265 (1977). See also e.g., Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSearch
-
body is especially appropriate in the area of liquor Page 459 U. S. 122 regulation. See, e.g., California v. LaRueSearch
-
California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. MidcalSearch
-
delegates to private, nongovernmental entities power to veto certain liquor license applications, Arno v. AlcoholicSearch
-
This is a power ordinarily vested in agencies of government. See, e.g., California v. LaRueSearch
-
Reynolds v. UnitedSearch
-
incidental entanglement between church and state authority is inevitable in a complex modern society, see, e.g., Lemon v. KurtzmanSearch
-
Walz v. TaxSearch
-
supra, at 403 U. S. 612 -613, quoting Walz v. TaxSearch
-
Comm'n, supra, at 397 U. S. 674 . See also Widmar v. VincentSearch
-
Wolman v. WalterSearch
-
of that faith. We can assume that churches would act in good faith in their exercise of the statutory power, see Lemon v. KurtzmanSearch
-
Levitt v. CommitteeSearch
-
Public Education & Religious Liberty v. NyquistSearch
-
effect of advancing religion. Turning to the third phase of the inquiry called for by Lemon v. KurtzmanSearch
-
Wall. 679, 80 U. S. 730 (1872), quoting Harmon v. DreherSearch
-
Abington School District Page 459 U. S. 127 v. SchemppSearch
-
U. S. 203 , 374 U. S. 222 (1963). See, e.g., Walz v. TaxSearch
-
Everson v. BoardSearch
-
a statute that distinguishes between religions on the basis of commitment to belief in a divinity. See Torcaso v. WatkinsSearch
-
See O'Brien v. SkinnerSearch
-
See California v. LaRueSearch
-
appears flatly contradicted by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court's own interpretation of the statute, see Arno v. AlcoholicSearch
-
Commission might review the decisionmaking of the churches would present serious entanglement problems. See Lemon v. KurtzmanSearch
-
NLRB v. CatholicSearch
-
and ecclesiastical control. B. Bailyn, Ideological Origins of the American Revolution 98-99, n. 3 (1967). See McDaniel v. PatySearch
-
cases, make bad law. Northern Securities Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Nixon v. AdministratorSearch
-
ante at 459 U. S. 124 (footnote omitted), would be valid. See California v. LaRueSearch
-
developed in Walz v. TaxSearch
-
the same reasons it can protect them from fire, see Walz, supra, at 397 U. S. 671 , noise, see Grayned v. CitySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Larkin v. Grendel'sSearch
-
Grendel's Den, Inc. v. GoodwinSearch
-
of Parker v. BrownSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial