Citation network
Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. Vs. Risjord
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 13, 1981
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSearch
-
U.S. 368 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSearch
-
U.S. 368 (1981) Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSearch
-
exception of Cohen v. BeneficialSearch
-
The Court of Appeals reasoned that such orders did not fall within the collateral order doctrine of Cohen v. BeneficialSearch
-
Coopers Page 449 U. S. 374 & Lybrand v. LivesaySearch
-
U. S. 463 , 437 U. S. 467 (1978), quoting Catlin v. UnitedSearch
-
Cobbledick v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 309 U. S. 323 , 309 U. S. 325 (1940). See DiBella v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 124 (1962). The rule also serves the important purpose of promoting efficient judicial administration. Eisen v. CarlisleSearch
-
await final judgment on the merits. In Cohen v. BeneficialSearch
-
Ibid. See, e.g., United States v. RiverSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Bronson v. LaCrosseSearch
-
Whiting v. BankSearch
-
Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySearch
-
supra at 437 U. S. 468 (footnote omitted). See Abney v. UnitedSearch
-
Abney v. UnitedSearch
-
defendant has claimed that he is about to be subjected to forbidden double jeopardy, Page 449 U. S. 377 Abney v. UnitedSearch
-
States, supra, or a violation of his constitutional right to bail, Stack v. BoyleSearch
-
By way of contrast, we have generally denied review of pretrial discovery orders, see, e.g., United States v. RyanSearch
-
citation to be entered against him, and challenge the order on direct appeal of the contempt ruling. See Cobbledick v. UnitedSearch
-
only after trial, United States v. MacDonaldSearch
-
U.S. at 437 U. S. 469 , quoting Mercantile National Bank v. LangdeauSearch
-
Armstrong v. McAlpinSearch
-
Will v. UnitedSearch
-
is vacated, and the case is remanded with instructions to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See DiBella v. UnitedSearch
-
App. 160, quoting International Business Machines Corp. v. LevinSearch
-
F.2d 433 (CA2 1980), cert. pending, No. 80-431, overruling Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. ChryslerSearch
-
Melamed v. ITTSearch
-
Continental Baking Co., 592 F.2d 290 (CA6 1979) ( Melamed II ), overruling Melamed v. ITTSearch
-
Community Broadcasting of Boston, Inc. v. FCCSearch
-
Cord v. SmithSearch
-
See Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Kerr-McGeeSearch
-
MacKethan v. PeatSearch
-
Kroungold v. TriesterSearch
-
Fullmer v. HarperSearch
-
Uniweld Products, Inc. v. UnionSearch
-
made their decisions prospective only, and therefore reached the merits of the disputes before them. See Armstrong v. McAlpinSearch
-
In Cohen v. BeneficialSearch
-
Id. at 337 U. S. 546 -547. Just recently, in Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySearch
-
The possibility that a district judge would reconsider his determination was highly significant in United States v. MacDonaldSearch
-
the disputed question. The District Court remains free to reconsider its decision at any time. See Armstrong v. McAlpinSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSearch
-
of Cohen v. BeneficialSearch
-
& Lybrand v. LivesaySearch
-
Catlin v. UnitedSearch
-
See DiBella v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial