Citation network
Weaver Vs. Graham
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 24, 1981
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 24 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court Weaver v. GrahamSearch
-
U.S. 24 (1981) Weaver v. GrahamSearch
-
it must apply to events occurring before its enactment, and it must disadvantage the offender affected by it. Lindsey v. WashingtonSearch
-
Harris v. WainwrightSearch
-
Wall. 277, 71 U. S. 325 -326 (1867). See Lindsey v. WashingtonSearch
-
Rooney v. NorthSearch
-
effect and permit individuals to rely on their meaning until explicitly Page 450 U. S. 29 changed. Dobbert v. FloridaSearch
-
The ban also restricts governmental power by restraining arbitrary and potentially vindictive legislation. Malloy v. SouthSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
for claims under the Contracts or Due Process Clauses, which solely protect preexisting entitlements. See, e.g., Wood v. LovettSearch
-
Dodge v. BoardSearch
-
Education, 302 U. S. 74 , 302 U. S. 78 -79 (1937). See also United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSearch
-
petitioner's prison term -- and that his effective sentence is altered once this determinant is changed. See Lindsey v. WashingtonSearch
-
Greenfield v. ScafatiSearch
-
F.Supp. 644 (Mass.1967) (three-judge court), summarily aff'd, 390 U. S. 713 (1968). See also Rodriguez v. UnitedSearch
-
into both the defendant's decision to plea bargain and the judge's calculation of the sentence to be imposed. Wolff v. McDonnellSearch
-
Durant v. UnitedSearch
-
enactment, but not when applied only prospectively. Compare In re Medley, 134 U. S. 16 (1890), with Holden v. MinnesotaSearch
-
U. S. 483 (1890). See also Cummings v. MissouriSearch
-
See Dobbert v. FloridaSearch
-
state criminal statute ameliorates or worsens conditions imposed by its predecessor is a federal question. Lindsey v. WashingtonSearch
-
supra at 301 U. S. 400 . See Malloy v. SouthSearch
-
provision, and not to any special circumstances that may mitigate its effect on the particular individual. Dobert v. FloridaSearch
-
in gain-time accumulation lengthens the period that someone in petitioner's position must spend in prison. In Lindsey v. WashingtonSearch
-
Page 450 U. S. 34 opportunity to shorten his time in prison simply through good conduct. In Greenfield v. ScafatiSearch
-
F.Supp. at 646 (quoting In re Medley, supra at 134 U. S. 171 ). See also Murphy v. CommonwealthSearch
-
of criminal penalties, and extended the incarceration of juvenile offenders. 376 So.2d at 857 (distinguishing Dowd v. SimsSearch
-
Goldsworthy v. HannifinSearch
-
after the fact. Calder v. BullSearch
-
Dall. at 3 U. S. 397 (Paterson, J.). See also Fletcher v. PeckSearch
-
See Jaehne v. NewSearch
-
U. S. 574 , 110 U. S. 590 (1884). See Dobbert v. FloridaSearch
-
substantial right, however, is not merely procedural, even if the statute takes a seemingly procedural form. Thompson v. UtahSearch
-
In using the concept of vested rights, Harris v. WainwrightSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Weaver v. GrahamSearch
-
See Lindsey v. WashingtonSearch
-
Dobbert v. FloridaSearch
-
Malloy v. SouthSearch
-
Wood v. LovettSearch
-
United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSearch
-
Rodriguez v. UnitedSearch
-
Holden v. MinnesotaSearch
-
See Malloy v. SouthSearch
-
Dobert v. FloridaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial