Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Michael M. Vs. Superior Ct.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 23, 1981

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

61 entries 13 linked 48 unlinked
Show
  1. Rinaldi Vs. Yeager US Supreme Court · May 31, 1966
    Relied / Followed
  2. Parham Vs. Hughes US Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1979
  3. Califano Vs. Webster US Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1977
  4. Schlesinger Vs. Ballard US Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1975
  5. Kahn Vs. Shevin US Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1974
  6. Weinberger Vs. Wiesenfeld US Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1975
  7. Palmer Vs. Thompson US Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1971
  8. Mcginnis Vs. Royster US Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1973
  9. Reed Vs. Reed US Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1971
    Relied / Followed
  10. Orr Vs. Orr US Supreme Court · Mar 05, 1979
  11. Craig Vs. Boren US Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1976
    Relied / Followed
  12. Reitman Vs. Mulkey US Supreme Court · May 29, 1967
  13. Frontiero Vs. Richardson US Supreme Court · May 14, 1973
  14. Michael M. v. Superior
    Search
  15. Ct. - 450 U.S. 464 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court Michael M. v. Superior
    Search
  16. Ct., 450 U.S. 464 (1981) Michael M. v. Superior
    Search
  17. to legitimate state ends. Reed v. Reed
    Search
  18. judgment should be affirmed on the basis of the applicable test for gender-based classifications as set forth in Reed v. Reed
    Search
  19. U. S. 71 , 404 U. S. 76 , and Craig v. Boren
    Search
  20. challenges to gender-based classifications. The issues posed by such challenges range from issues of standing, see Orr v. Orr
    Search
  21. to those classifications. See Stanton v. Stanton
    Search
  22. when gender-based classifications are challenged. See Craig v. Boren
    Search
  23. POWELL, J., concurring). In Reed v. Reed
    Search
  24. to legitimate state ends, while in Craig v. Boren
    Search
  25. U. S. 305 , 384 U. S. 309 (1966), quoting Tigner v. Texas
    Search
  26. but rather realistically reflects the fact that the sexes are not similarly situated in certain circumstances. Parham v. Hughes
    Search
  27. purpose of a statute is likely to be elusive. Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan
    Search
  28. sought to prevent illegitimate teenage pregnancies. That finding, of course, is entitled to great deference. Reitman v. Mulkey
    Search
  29. might have been, but whether the line chosen by the California Legislature is within constitutional limitations. Kahn v. Shevin
    Search
  30. grounds that very young females are particularly susceptible to physical injury from sexual intercourse, see Rundlett v. Oliver
    Search
  31. as in Frontiero v. Richardson
    Search
  32. as in Orr v. Orr
    Search
  33. and state courts have almost uniformly concluded that statutory rape law are constitutional. See, e.g., Rundlett v. Oliver
    Search
  34. Hall v. McKenzie
    Search
  35. Hall v. State
    Search
  36. State v. Gray
    Search
  37. People v. Mackey
    Search
  38. People v. Salinas
    Search
  39. State v. Brothers
    Search
  40. Barnes v. State
    Search
  41. State v. Drake
    Search
  42. State v. Bell
    Search
  43. State v. Rundlett
    Search
  44. Green v. State
    Search
  45. State v. Meloon
    Search
  46. State v. Thompson
    Search
  47. People v. Whidden
    Search
  48. State v. Wilson
    Search
  49. Olson v. State
    Search
  50. State v. Elmore
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial