Citation network
City of Memphis Vs. Greene
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 20, 1981
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 100 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court City of Memphis v. GreeneSearch
-
U.S. 100 (1981) City of Memphis v. GreeneSearch
-
has caused some slight inconvenience to black motorists. II Under the Court's recent decisions in Washington v. DavisSearch
-
U. S. 229 , and Arlington Heights v. MetropolitanSearch
-
is directly applicable to private parties, Jones v. AlfredSearch
-
Runyon v. McCrarySearch
-
black citizens, but also their right to acquire and use property on an equal basis with white citizens. Thus, in Hurd v. HodgeSearch
-
In Sullivan v. LittleSearch
-
In Tillman v. Wheaton-HavenSearch
-
Relying on Justice Black's opinion for the Court in Palmer v. ThompsonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
authority is not inconsistent with the view that the Amendment has self-executing force. As the Court noted in Jones v. AlfredSearch
-
or for a community's reaction to a tragic accident that adequate planning might have prevented. See Thomas Cusack Co. v. ChicagoSearch
-
Arlington County Board v. RichardsSearch
-
home is his castle. The interest in privacy has the same dignity in a densely populated apartment complex, cf. Payton v. NewSearch
-
that it had no authority to review the wisdom of the city's policy decision. See Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. NewSearch
-
Overton Park was described in Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSearch
-
short, the effect of the proposed closing, whether wise or unwise, is the same upon whites as it is to blacks. Palmer v. ThompsonSearch
-
to racially discriminate based upon a consideration of other evidence in the case as directed in Arlington Heights v. MetropolitanSearch
-
to oppose the prompt desegregation of its municipal parks and recreational facilities as late as 1963, see Watson v. MemphisSearch
-
to demonstrate some impairment of property interests. In Wright v. SalisburySearch
-
encouraged to join the club and residency, as a practical matter, assured approval of an application. See, e.g., Moore v. TownsendSearch
-
Clark v. UniversalSearch
-
Gore v. TurnerSearch
-
Scott v. EversoleSearch
-
Concerned Tenants Assn. v. IndianSearch
-
Newbern v. LakeSearch
-
Sims v. OrderSearch
-
Gonzalez v. SouthernSearch
-
The absence of such restriction distinguishes this case from the Fifth Circuit's decision in Jennings v. PattersonSearch
-
which protects the right of all citizens to enter into and enforce contracts, see Runyon v. McCrarySearch
-
Jones v. AlfredSearch
-
Griffin v. BreckenridgeSearch
-
which prohibits peonage, see Pollock v. WilliamsSearch
-
which provides for criminal punishment of those who impose conditions of peonage on any person, see Clyatt v. UnitedSearch
-
the ban against slavery. See nn. 32 38 supra. Although the Court expressly overruled Hodges v. UnitedSearch
-
Civil Rights Act was specifically designed to stem this tide of oppression. See Jones Page 451 U. S. 133 v. AlfredSearch
-
that respondents had failed to meet their burden of establishing discriminatory intent. See Arlington Heights v. MetropolitanSearch
-
Washington v. DavisSearch
-
Jones v. AlfredSearch
-
U. S. 369 , 387 U. S. 378 (1967), quoting Burton v. WilmingtonSearch
-
respondents produced at trial precisely the kind of evidence of intent that we deemed probative in Arlington Heights v. MetropolitanSearch
-
H. Mayer Co., 392 U. S. 409 , 392 U. S. 436 (1968). See Tillman v. Wheaton-HavenSearch
-
Sullivan v. LittleSearch
-
H. Mayer Co., supra, at 392 U. S. 437 , quoting United States v. PriceSearch
-
a city is Page 451 U. S. 150 precisely the kind of injury that the statute was enacted to prevent. In Jones v. AlfredSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial