Citation network
Arizona Vs. Manypenny
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 21, 1981
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 232 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court Arizona v. ManypennySearch
-
U.S. 232 (1981) Arizona v. ManypennySearch
-
Relying on principles enunciated in In re Neale, 135 U. S. 1 , 135 U. S. 75 (1890), and Clifton v. CoxSearch
-
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, by a brief per curiam opinion citing Sanabria v. UnitedSearch
-
an appeal from an adverse decision in a criminal case only if expressly authorized by statute to do so. United States v. MartinSearch
-
United States v. WilsonSearch
-
the prosecution seeks review of a judgment of acquittal following a guilty verdict. See, e.g., State ex rel. Hyder v. SuperiorSearch
-
Hyder v. SuperiorSearch
-
Dawson v. SuperiorSearch
-
Court, 112 Ariz. 123, 538 P.2d 397 (1975). See also State v. AllenSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
State v. LopezSearch
-
State v. GradillasSearch
-
court conducts the trial under federal rules of procedure while applying the criminal law of the State. Tennessee v. DavisSearch
-
removal permits a trial upon the merits of the state law question free from local interests or prejudice. See Colorado v. SymesSearch
-
It also enables the defendant to have the validity of his immunity defense adjudicated in a federal forum. Willingham v. MorganSearch
-
this Court retains the highest regard for a State's right to make and enforce its own criminal laws. Colorado v. SymesSearch
-
Patterson v. NewSearch
-
Huffman v. PursueSearch
-
in enforcing its criminal laws merits comparable judicial respect when pursued in the federal courts. Cf. Colorado v. SymesSearch
-
Will v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 389 U. S. 90 , 389 U. S. 96 (1967), quoting from Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
individuals should be free from the harassment and vexation of unbounded litigation by the sovereign. See, e.g.,State v. JonesSearch
-
People v. CorningSearch
-
double jeopardy, which bars an appeal by the prosecutor following a jury verdict of acquittal. See, e.g., People v. WebbSearch
-
State v. BurrisSearch
-
State v. HandSearch
-
Ark. 169, 171 (1845). See also Burks v. UnitedSearch
-
Fong Foo v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 369 U. S. 141 , 369 U. S. 143 (1962). See generally United States v. DiFrancescoSearch
-
authorization to the contrary. This presumption was first announced as a rule of federal law in United States v. SangesSearch
-
does not authorize such a federal appeal. DiBella v. UnitedSearch
-
Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 354 U.S. Page 451 U. S. 247 394, 354 U. S. 400 -403 (1957). See Will v. UnitedSearch
-
Clause of the Fifth Amendment, which is enforceable against the States through the Fourteenth Amendment. Benton v. MarylandSearch
-
by the Arizona Supreme Court, the statute also authorizes review for abuse of discretion. State ex rel. Hyder v. SuperiorSearch
-
Ronan v. SuperiorSearch
-
Mahoney v. StevensSearch
-
this provision, it may furnish an additional basis for appellate review here. See generally State ex rel Hyder v. SuperiorSearch
-
State v. WynnSearch
-
on several decisions, none of which involved proceedings removed from state to federal court. See D'Oench, Duhme Co. v. FederalSearch
-
Board of Comm'rs v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. CrainSearch
-
of the federal officer removal statute. Willingham v. MoranSearch
-
U. S. 402 , 395 U. S. 405 -406 (1969). It has been 100 years since the Court in Tennessee v. DavisSearch
-
none upon removal, even though the federal court would have had jurisdiction if the suit had originated there. Freeman v. BeeSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial