Citation network
Ball Vs. James
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 29, 1981
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 355 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court Ball v. JamesSearch
-
U.S. 355 (1981) Ball v. JamesSearch
-
of Appeals reversed. It held that the case was governed by the one-person, one-vote principle established in Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
U. S. 533 , rather than by the exception to that principle established in Salyer Land Co. v. TulareSearch
-
F.2d 180. Noting this Court's repeated application of the one-person, one-vote principle established in Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
Salyer Land Co. v. TulareSearch
-
Salyer the Court of Appeals did not apply these criteria correctly to the facts of this case. III Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
Protection Clause requires adherence to the principle of one-person, one-vote in elections of state legislators. Avery v. MidlandSearch
-
In Hadley v. JuniorSearch
-
of which were farmed by one or another of four corporations. Salyer Land Co. v. TulareSearch
-
remain essentially business enterprises, created by and chiefly benefiting a specific group of landowners. Niedner v. SaltSearch
-
Uhlmann v. WrenSearch
-
I.B.E.W. v. SaltSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
in a different context, the provision of electricity is not a traditional element of governmental sovereignty, Jackson v. MetropolitanSearch
-
representing a majority of the acreage of the lands within the proposed district. Associated Enterprises, Inc. v. ToltecSearch
-
In Kramer v. UnionSearch
-
and collect special assessments also does not create such general governmental authority. Associated Enterprises, Inc. v. ToltecSearch
-
voting eligibility to property ownership in elections to approve issuance of bonds to finance a city library, Hill v. StoneSearch
-
U. S. 289 , and a municipal utility, Cipriano v. CitySearch
-
U. S. 701 (per curiam), and to issue general obligation bonds secured by a lien on real property, Phoenix v. KolodziejskiSearch
-
do not bear on the question of a special-purpose governmental entity like the Salt River District. See Salyer Land Co. v. TulareSearch
-
exercise more immediate control over the management of the entity than their numbers would dictate. Salyer Land Co. v. TulareSearch
-
Lake Basin Water Storage District, 410 U. S. 719 (1973). See Hadley v. JuniorSearch
-
Avery v. MidlandSearch
-
applicable to the elections of bodies that exercise general governmental powers. Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
with political structures to meet the often novel problems confronting local communities. E.g., Holt Civic Club v. TuscaloosaSearch
-
Given the broad reforms effected by Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
political safeguard was a major justification for the Court's role in requiring legislative reapportionment. See Baker v. CarrSearch
-
The Court has held that school boards must be elected on a strictly majoritarian basis. Hadley v. JuniorSearch
-
Kramer v. UnionSearch
-
Court's judgment as to the unique importance of education among the functions of modern local government. See Brown v. BoardSearch
-
of Education, 347 U. S. 483 , 347 U. S. 493 (1954). Cf. Holt Civic Club v. TuscaloosaSearch
-
purpose election by a fairly elected legislature in Kramer, supra, at 395 U. S. 628 . See also Avery v. MidlandSearch
-
scheme is constitutional, the Court misapplies the limited exception recognized in Salyer Land Co. v. TulareSearch
-
Phoenix v. KolodziejskiSearch
-
See Avery v. MidlandSearch
-
were parents or custodians of children enrolled in the local public Page 451 U. S. 376 schools. In Cipriano v. CitySearch
-
tax revenues. Phoenix, supra, at 399 U. S. 209 -213. See also Police Jury of Parish of Vermilion v. HebertSearch
-
limiting the vote to landowners in electing the board of directors of a Water Storage District in Salyer Land Co. v. TulareSearch
-
See Associated Enterprises, Inc. v. ToltecSearch
-
Otter Tail Power Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Rubenstein Construction Co. v. SaltSearch
-
U.S. at 410 U. S. 728 -729 (emphasis supplied). In Cipriano v. CitySearch
-
U.S. at 395 U. S. 629 . In Hadley v. JuniorSearch
-
by the trustees of a Junior College District were substantially less significant than those exercised in Avery v. MidlandSearch
-
on the land is, at best, speculative. Certainly, any direct impact on the land is no greater than in Phoenix v. KolodziejskiSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Ball v. JamesSearch
-
III Reynolds v. SimsSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial