Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Webb Vs. Webb

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 18, 1981

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

30 entries 6 linked 24 unlinked
Show
  1. Bailey Vs. Anderson US Supreme Court · Nov 05, 1945
  2. Stanley Vs. Illinois US Supreme Court · Apr 03, 1972
  3. Younger Vs. Harris US Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1971
  4. Picard Vs. Connor US Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1971
  5. Boynton Vs. Virginia US Supreme Court · Dec 05, 1960
  6. Fuller Vs. Oregon US Supreme Court · May 20, 1974
  7. U.S. 493 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court Webb v. Webb
    Search
  8. U.S. 493 (1981) Webb v. Webb
    Search
  9. Street v. New
    Search
  10. Fuller v. Oregon
    Search
  11. the federal claim was adequately presented Page 451 U. S. 497 in the state system. New York ex rel. Bryant v. Zimmerman
    Search
  12. Oxley Stave Co. v. Butler
    Search
  13. at any point in the state court proceedings. Thus, we confront in this case the same problem that arose in Cardinale v. Louisiana
    Search
  14. Ibid. We have had several occasions to repeat this rule since then, Tacon v. Arizona
    Search
  15. Moore v. Illinois
    Search
  16. Hill v. California
    Search
  17. University of California Regents v. Bakke
    Search
  18. of POWELL, J.), and we see no reason to deviate from it now. It is appropriate to emphasize again, see Cardinale v. Louisiana
    Search
  19. citations of authority to support enumerated errors will bar review of those errors in the State Supreme Court. Watts v. Mitchell
    Search
  20. Wood v. Georgia
    Search
  21. Vachon v. New
    Search
  22. Bryant v. Zimmerman
    Search
  23. to review plain error unchallenged in the state court when necessary to prevent fundamental unfairness. Wood v. Georgia
    Search
  24. U. S. 261 , 450 U. S. 265 , n. 5 (1981). See also Vachon v. New
    Search
  25. U.S. Supreme Court Webb v. Webb
    Search
  26. Cardinale v. Louisiana
    Search
  27. Tacon v. Arizona
    Search
  28. the State Supreme Court. Watts v. Mitchell
    Search
  29. Wood v. Georgia
    Search
  30. Chambers v. Mississippi
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales