Citation network
Clayton Vs. Automobile Workers
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 26, 1981
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Clayton v. AutomobileSearch
-
Workers - 451 U.S. 679 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court Clayton v. AutomobileSearch
-
Workers, 451 U.S. 679 (1981) Clayton v. InternationalSearch
-
not directly applicable to the issue whether to require exhaustion of internal union procedures. Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSearch
-
a). Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSearch
-
Hines v. AnchorSearch
-
respect to either the suit against the employer or the suit against the union. II In Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSearch
-
In deciding that issue, we looked to principles of federal common law. See Textile Workers v. LincolnSearch
-
resolution of disputes arising over the interpretation and application of collective bargaining agreements. See Hines v. AnchorSearch
-
union matters such as those involving the interpretation and application of a union constitution. As we stated in NLRB v. MarineSearch
-
policies extending far beyond internal union interests. Page 451 U. S. 689 See United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSearch
-
Hines v. AnchorSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
internal union procedures that may not be adequate to redress their underlying grievances. As we stated in NLRB v. MarineSearch
-
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSearch
-
ante at 451 U. S. 63 , quoting Auto Workers v. HoosierSearch
-
suits, based on the same facts, proceeding at different paces in its courtroom. As we suggested in Vaca v. SipesSearch
-
Together with No. 80-54, ITT Gilfillan, a Division of International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. v. ClaytonSearch
-
breached its duty of fair representation and that the employer breached the collective bargaining agreement. Hines v. AnchorSearch
-
Johnson v. GeneralSearch
-
Geddes v. ChryslerSearch
-
Petersen v. RathSearch
-
Retana v. ApartmentSearch
-
Varra v. DillonSearch
-
Baldini v. LocalSearch
-
Winter v. LocalSearch
-
Harrison v. ChryslerSearch
-
Fizer v. SafewaySearch
-
Imel v. ZohnSearch
-
Tinsley v. UnitedSearch
-
Buzzard v. LocalSearch
-
agreement, he should also be required to pursue the dispute resolution procedures created by that agreement. See Hines v. AnchorSearch
-
In NLRB v. MarineSearch
-
bargaining agreement. Damages, however, can be assessed against both the employer and the union. As we stated in Vaca v. SipesSearch
-
waiver provision in Art. IX, which establishes the 15-day time limit for requesting arbitration. See also Tinsley v. UnitedSearch
-
when those procedures could lead to reactivation of a stalled grievance is wholly consistent with Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSearch
-
suit would still be entitled to prove that no such breach had occurred. See Vaca v. SipesSearch
-
standard for breach of the duty of fair representation that we developed in Vaca v. SipesSearch
-
Klein, supra, at 99. See also Johnson v. GeneralSearch
-
is immaterial. The situation presented in this case is well within the doctrine underlying Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSearch
-
time limits that appear on their face to bar revival of the grievance. As the Court noted in John Wiley & Sons v. LivingstonSearch
-
reviewing the manner in which it has represented an employee during a grievance. It is worth nothing that neither NLRB v. MarineSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Clayton v. AutomobileSearch
-
Clayton v. InternationalSearch
-
II In Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSearch
-
See Textile Workers v. LincolnSearch
-
NLRB v. MarineSearch
-
See United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial