Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Schad Vs. Borough of Mount Ephraim

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 01, 1981

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

60 entries 8 linked 52 unlinked
Show
  1. Jenkins Vs. Georgia US Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1974
  2. Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. Vs. Conrad US Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1975
  3. California Vs. Larue US Supreme Court · Dec 05, 1972
  4. Village of Belle Terre Vs. Boraas US Supreme Court · Apr 01, 1974
  5. Kovacs Vs. Cooper US Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1949
  6. Schneider Vs. State US Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1939
  7. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. Vs. Wilson US Supreme Court · May 26, 1952
  8. Naacp Vs. Button US Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1963
  9. Schad v. Borough
    Search
  10. of Mount Ephraim - 452 U.S. 61 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court Schad v. Borough
    Search
  11. of Mount Ephraim, 452 U.S. 61 (1981) Schad v. Borough
    Search
  12. some other form of live presentation. App. to Juris. Statement 8a, 12a. Reliance was placed on the statement in Young v. American
    Search
  13. entertainment such as musical and dramatic works, fall within the First Amendment guarantee. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson
    Search
  14. Page 452 U. S. 66 Schacht v. United
    Search
  15. Erznoznik v. City
    Search
  16. Doran v. Salem
    Search
  17. Inn, Inc., 422 U. S. 922 (1975). See also California v. LaRue
    Search
  18. Young v. American
    Search
  19. does not place otherwise protected material outside the mantle of the First Amendment. Jenkins v. Georgia
    Search
  20. in this case recognized, nude dancing is not without its First Amendment protections from official regulation. Doran v. Salem
    Search
  21. Grayned v. City
    Search
  22. Moore v. East
    Search
  23. assertedly threatened or violated, rather than by the power being exercised or the specific limitation imposed. Thomas v. Collins
    Search
  24. related to legitimate state concerns and does not deprive the owner of economically viable use of his property. Agins v. City
    Search
  25. Euclid v. Ambler
    Search
  26. S. 365 , 272 U. S. 395 (1926). But an ordinance may fail even under that limited standard of review. Moore v. East
    Search
  27. Nectow v. Cambridge
    Search
  28. In Schneider v. State
    Search
  29. Similarly, in Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens
    Search
  30. regulations designed to serve those interests without unnecessarily interfering with First Amendment freedoms. Hynes v. Mayor
    Search
  31. First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti
    Search
  32. rules in the area of free expression are suspect. Precision of regulation must be the touchstone. . . .' NAACP v. Button
    Search
  33. U. S. 71 JUSTICE POWELL said much the same thing in addressing the validity of a zoning ordinance in Moore v. East
    Search
  34. and the means chosen to further those interests. As an initial matter, this case is not controlled by Young v. American
    Search
  35. authority has arrived at a defensible conclusion that unusual problems are presented by live entertainment. Cf. Young v. American
    Search
  36. In Grayned v. City
    Search
  37. but also must Page 452 U. S. 76 leave open adequate alternative channels of communication. Grayned v. City
    Search
  38. Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public
    Search
  39. Virginia Pharmacy Board v. Virginia
    Search
  40. including nonobscene nude dancing that is otherwise protected by the First Amendment. As we have observed, Young v. American
    Search
  41. In Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas
    Search
  42. Id. at 416 U. S. 18 (citation omitted). Moore v. East
    Search
  43. that the regulation must be narrowly drawn to avoid unnecessary intrusion on freedom of expression. See United States v. O'Brien
    Search
  44. it may have concluded that live nude dancing is undesirable. Brief for Appellee 20. It is noted that in California v. LaRue
    Search
  45. as this record reveals, even the nude dancing involved in this case. Second, the regulation challenged in California v. LaRue
    Search
  46. had determined that significant problems were linked to the activity that was later regulated. Third, in California v. LaRue
    Search
  47. the Court relied heavily on the State's power under the Twenty-first Amendment. Cf. Doran v. Salem
    Search
  48. Philadelphia, a community in whose decisions I would have no political voice. Cf. Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. Conrad
    Search
  49. U.S. Supreme Court Schad v. Borough
    Search
  50. Schacht v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial