Citation network
Little Vs. Streater
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 01, 1981
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 1 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court Little v. StreaterSearch
-
U.S. 1 (1981) Little v. StreaterSearch
-
and the governmental interests affected. Mathews v. EldridgeSearch
-
trial court's judgment in a per curiam opinion that is not officially reported. Relying on its prior decision in Ferro v. MorganSearch
-
Joint Anti-Facist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSearch
-
U. S. 471 , 408 U. S. 481 (1972). In Boddie v. ConnecticutSearch
-
Accord, Armstrong v. ManzoSearch
-
Mullane v. CentralSearch
-
Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U. S. 306 , 339 U. S. 313 (1950). And in Mathews v. EldridgeSearch
-
Cortese v. CorteseSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
See Maher v. DoeSearch
-
Robertson v. ApuzzoSearch
-
and 53-304 (1981). Cf. Walker v. StokesSearch
-
People v. DohertySearch
-
Mosher v. BennettSearch
-
Conn. 671, 672, 144 A. 297 (1929). In Booth v. HartSearch
-
Nevertheless, in Mosher v. BennettSearch
-
Emphasis added.) Page 452 U. S. 12 Accord, Kelsaw v. GreenSearch
-
with the command of the Due Process Clause. Page 452 U. S. 13 C Our holding in Mathews v. EldridgeSearch
-
of familial bonds, whether or not legitimized by marriage, and accorded them constitutional protection. See Stanley v. IllinoisSearch
-
U. S. 651 -652 (1972). Just as the termination of such bonds demands procedural fairness, see Lassiter v. DepartmentSearch
-
Lassiter v. DepartmentSearch
-
of Social Services, post at 452 U. S. 28 . Assessment of the Mathews v. EldridgeSearch
-
expressed by the Due Process Clause was not satisfied here. Lassiter v. DepartmentSearch
-
fathers may not constitutionally be denied access to blood grouping tests on the basis of indigency. See Franklin v. DistrictSearch
-
Commonwealth v. PossehlSearch
-
Graves v. DaughertySearch
-
an indigent access to its divorce courts because of inability to pay filing fees and costs. However, in United States v. KrasSearch
-
U. S. 434 (1973), and Ortwein v. SchwabSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Little v. StreaterSearch
-
Ferro v. MorganSearch
-
In Boddie v. ConnecticutSearch
-
Robertson v. ApuzzoSearch
-
Cf. Walker v. StokesSearch
-
In Booth v. HartSearch
-
Accord, Kelsaw v. GreenSearch
-
See Stanley v. IllinoisSearch
-
Assessment of the Mathews v. EldridgeSearch
-
See Franklin v. DistrictSearch
-
Graves v. DaughertySearch
-
and Ortwein v. SchwabSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial