Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Donovan Vs. Dewey

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 17, 1981

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

57 entries 1 linked 56 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Biswell US Supreme Court · May 15, 1972
  2. U.S. 594 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court Donovan v. Dewey
    Search
  3. U.S. 594 (1981) Donovan v. Dewey
    Search
  4. certainty and regularity of its application, provides a constitutionally adequate substitute for a warrant. Marshall v. Barlow's
    Search
  5. Marshall v. Dewey
    Search
  6. against unreasonable searches applies to administrative inspections of private commercial property. Marshall v. Barlow's
    Search
  7. See v. City
    Search
  8. searches of commercial property do not necessarily violate the Fourth Amendment. See, e.g., United States v. Biswell
    Search
  9. Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United
    Search
  10. circumstances, be adequately protected by regulatory schemes authorizing warrantless inspections. United States v. Biswell
    Search
  11. they are not authorized by law or are unnecessary for the furtherance of federal interests. Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United
    Search
  12. has no real expectation that his property will from time to time be inspected by government officials. Marshall v. Barlow's
    Search
  13. Colonnade Corp. v. United
    Search
  14. Marshall v. Barlow's
    Search
  15. Camara v. Municipal
    Search
  16. of regularity provided by a warrant may be unnecessary under certain inspection schemes. Thus, in Colonnade Corp. v. United
    Search
  17. U.S. at 397 U. S. 76 -77. Similarly, in United States v. Biswell
    Search
  18. for specific purposes. We reemphasized this exception to the warrant requirement most recently in Marshall v. Barlow's
    Search
  19. of the Act, Marshall v. Barlow's
    Search
  20. court an order accommodating any unusual privacy interests that the mine owner might have. See, e.g., Marshall v. Stobdt's
    Search
  21. U.S. at 397 U. S. 75 , and more recently, in Marshall v. Barlow's
    Search
  22. a warrant is necessary to render an inspection program reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Thus, in United States v. Biswell
    Search
  23. inspection provisions of the Act as they apply to quarry operations similar to appellees' facility. See Marshall v. Texoline
    Search
  24. Marshall v. Nolichuckey
    Search
  25. Marshall v. Stoudt's
    Search
  26. circumstances, a private home may not be entered to conduct a search or effect an arrest without a warrant. Steagald v. United
    Search
  27. Payton v. New
    Search
  28. Johnson v. United
    Search
  29. restrictions pertain when commercial property is searched for contraband or evidence of crime. G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United
    Search
  30. JUSTICE STEVENS, concurring. Like JUSTICE STEWART, I believe the Court erred in Camara v. Municipal
    Search
  31. Court, 387 U. S. 523 , when it overruled Frank v. Page
    Search
  32. Unlike him, however, I also think the Court erred in Marshall v. Barlow's
    Search
  33. See Florida Dept. of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Florida
    Search
  34. of stare decisis requires that we respect dictum unnecessary to the decision in Barlow's, Inc. Cf. McDaniel v. Sanchez
    Search
  35. the government must obtain a warrant to conduct a search or effect an arrest in a private home. Steagald v. United
    Search
  36. Hester v. United
    Search
  37. the Act in the absence of the particular fact situation presented here. JUSTICE STEWART, dissenting. In Frank v. Maryland
    Search
  38. Amendments place upon conventional searches. The Frank decision was overruled eight years later in Camara v. Municipal
    Search
  39. Camara, supra, at 387 U. S. 528 -529. This principle was reemphasized most recently in Marshall v. Barlow's
    Search
  40. U.S. at 387 U. S. 528 -529. In the companion case, See v. City
    Search
  41. Until today, exceptions to the general rule have been found in only two cases. In Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United
    Search
  42. that authorized warrantless searches of a liquor licensee's premises by Internal Revenue agents. And in United States v. Biswell
    Search
  43. premises of a licensed gun dealer to determine whether he was in compliance with the Gun Control Act. In Marshall v. Barlow's
    Search
  44. quoting Almeida-Sanchez v. United
    Search
  45. Marshall v. Wait
    Search
  46. U.S. Supreme Court Donovan v. Dewey
    Search
  47. Marshall v. Dewey
    Search
  48. Marshall v. Stobdt's
    Search
  49. See Marshall v. Texoline
    Search
  50. Steagald v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial