Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Howe Vs. Smith

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 17, 1981

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

31 entries 3 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. Udall Vs. Tallman US Supreme Court · Mar 01, 1965
  2. Moody Vs. Daggett US Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1976
  3. Crooks Vs. Harrelson US Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1930
  4. U.S. 473 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court Howe v. Smith
    Search
  5. U.S. 473 (1981) Howe v. Smith
    Search
  6. prison, the State's only maximum security facility, because Windsor had become inadequate in several respects. Rebidea v. Stoneman
    Search
  7. Bureau of Prisons. Respondent William Ciuros, Vermont's Commissioner of Corrections, intervened. Relying on Lono v. Fenton
    Search
  8. at 457. Page 452 U. S. 479 We granted certiorari to resolve the conflict in the Circuits. Sub nom. Howe v. Civiletti
    Search
  9. case involving the interpretation of a statute, analysis must begin with the language employed by Congress. Rubin v. United
    Search
  10. Reiter v. Sonotone
    Search
  11. b), and federal officials have discretion to decide which inmates have access to rehabilitation programs, Moody v. Daggett
    Search
  12. TVA v. Hill
    Search
  13. U. S. 153 , 437 U. S. 187 , n. 33 (1978) (quoting Crooks v. Harrelson
    Search
  14. their view of the meaning of the statute is entitled to considerable deference. NLRB v. Bell
    Search
  15. Though the Seventh Circuit, in both Lono v. Fenton
    Search
  16. F.2d 645 (1978) (en banc), and Anthony v. Wilkinson
    Search
  17. a) urged by the petitioner. Lono v. Fenton
    Search
  18. a) has rejected the petitioner's interpretation of that provision. Sisbarro v. Warden
    Search
  19. Beshaw v. Fenton
    Search
  20. Gereau v. Henderson
    Search
  21. Fletcher v. Warden
    Search
  22. Cf. Anthony v. Wilkinson
    Search
  23. Lono v. Fenton
    Search
  24. U.S. Supreme Court Howe v. Smith
    Search
  25. Rebidea v. Stoneman
    Search
  26. Howe v. Civiletti
    Search
  27. Congress. Rubin v. United
    Search
  28. NLRB v. Bell
    Search
  29. and Anthony v. Wilkinson
    Search
  30. Sisbarro v. Warden
    Search
  31. Gereau v. Henderson
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales