Citation network
Michigan Vs. Summers
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 22, 1981
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 692 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court Michigan v. SummersSearch
-
U.S. 692 (1981) Michigan v. SummersSearch
-
which we assume was unsupported by probable cause. In Dunaway v. NewSearch
-
Henry v. UnitedSearch
-
and provides the relative simplicity and clarity necessary to the implementation of a workable rule. See Brinegar v. UnitedSearch
-
could support the seizure as reasonable. Id. at 442 U. S. 209 . In the first such case, Terry v. OhioSearch
-
In the second such case, Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
And in United States v. Brignoni-PonceSearch
-
United States v. CortezSearch
-
basis for determining that suspicion of criminal activity justifies a detention of that occupant. In Payton v. NewSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
The Fourteenth Amendment requires the several States to secure these rights. See Payton v. NewSearch
-
Dunaway v. NewSearch
-
been found in the basement of respondent's house would apparently be insufficient to support a conviction. See People v. DavenportSearch
-
support a conviction, is not dispositive of the question whether the police had probable cause to arrest. See Brinegar v. UnitedSearch
-
issue presented in Ybarra v. IllinoisSearch
-
id. at 392 U. S. 34 (WHITE, J., concurring). In Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
United States v. Brignoni-PonceSearch
-
noted that the informant's tip was insufficient to justify an arrest or search based on probable cause under Spinelli v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 393 U. S. 410 , and Aguilar v. TexasSearch
-
that the absence of any articulable facts available to the officer rendered a detention unreasonable. In Delaware v. ProuseSearch
-
that the motorist was unlicensed or the car unregistered. In Brown v. TexasSearch
-
did not have any reasonable suspicion that the petitioner had committed or was committing a crime. Finally, in Ybarra v. IllinoisSearch
-
approved in Brignoni-Ponce did not encompass a search of the vehicle. The Court had held in Almeida-Sanchez v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 413 U. S. 266 , that such a search must be supported by probable cause. In United States v. Martinez-FuerteSearch
-
Cf. Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
entry of the home is the chief evil against which the wording of the Fourth Amendment is directed.' United States v. UnitedSearch
-
Payton v. NewSearch
-
Justice Jackson recognized the significance of this determination in Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
whether the same result would be justified if the search warrant merely authorized a search for evidence. Cf. Zurcher v. StanfordSearch
-
to perform a patdown for weapons when the police have reason to believe that he is armed and dangerous. E.g., Terry v. OhioSearch
-
near our international borders to question occupants of the vehicles about their citizenship. E.g., United States v. Brignoni-PonceSearch
-
Id. at 392 U. S. 24 . Similarly, in Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
Pennsylvania v. MimmsSearch
-
U. S. 106 , 434 U. S. 110 . See Ybarra v. IllinoisSearch
-
U. S. 85 , 444 U. S. 93 . In United States v. Brignoni-PonceSearch
-
U.S. at 422 U. S. 878 -879. And in United States v. Martinez-FuerteSearch
-
ability to conduct Page 452 U. S. 710 investigations which may eventually lead to probable cause. See Davis v. MississippiSearch
-
balancing test. As the Court said in Dunaway v. NewSearch
-
York, 442 U. S. 200 , 442 U. S. 210 , Terry v. OhioSearch
-
United States v. Brignoni-PonceSearch
-
U.S. at 422 U. S. 208 , quoting Brinegar v. UnitedSearch
-
that other persons in that circumstance might pose such a threat cannot justify a search or seizure. Ybarra v. IllinoisSearch
-
In a perplexing citation, the Court notes our holding in Payton v. NewSearch
-
The record does not clearly reveal the length of the search in this case. In Harris v. UnitedSearch
-
search of a one-bedroom apartment for burglar tools and a pair of checks consumed five hours. See also Stanford v. TexasSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial