Citation network
Schweiker Vs. Gray Panthers
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 25, 1981
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Schweiker v. GraySearch
-
Panthers - 453 U.S. 34 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court Schweiker v. GraySearch
-
Panthers, 453 U.S. 34 (1981) Schweiker v. GraySearch
-
to that applicant. The District Court agreed with respondent and declared the regulations invalid. Gray Panthers v. SecretarySearch
-
The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed, but under a different theory. Gray Panthers v. AdministratorSearch
-
U.S.App.D.C. 146, 629 F.2d 180 (1980). Citing this Court's decision in Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. VolpeSearch
-
Page 453 U. S. 43 We granted certiorari sub nom. Harris v. GraySearch
-
Friedman v. BergerSearch
-
the Secretary exceptionally broad authority to prescribe standards for applying certain sections of the Act. Batterton v. FrancisSearch
-
Clair, 610 F.2d 1228, 1236 (CA5 1980), cert. pending sub nom. Schweiker v. NormanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Brown v. StantonSearch
-
argues, permit the State only to consider the resources actually paid by the spouse to the applicant. See Herweg v. RaySearch
-
The administration of public assistance based on the use of a formula is not inherently arbitrary. Cf. Weinberger v. SalfiSearch
-
based on a theory inconsistent with law. Potomac Electric Power Co. v. DirectorSearch
-
b) Page 453 U. S. 50 States. Cf. Batterton v. FrancisSearch
-
and proved that some of its members are persons adversely affected by the Secretary's regulations. Compare Warth v. SeldinSearch
-
U. S. 490 , 422 U. S. 511 (1975), with Sierra Club v. MortonSearch
-
a) without regard to the amount in controversy. Cf. Chapman v. HoustonSearch
-
See Herweg v. RaySearch
-
Clair, 610 F.2d 1228 (CA5 1980) cert. pending sub nom. Schweiker v. NormanSearch
-
E.g., Van Lare v. HurleySearch
-
a)(7)). See also Lewis v. MartinSearch
-
King v. SmithSearch
-
The Court of Appeals thus erred in its reliance on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. VolpeSearch
-
U. S. 44 -48. In these circumstances, the Secretary need not do more. Cf. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NaturalSearch
-
the Secretary had failed to consider all relevant factors as required by Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. VolpeSearch
-
Clair, 610 F.2d 1228, 1237-1238 (CA5 1980), cert. pending sub nom. Schweiker v. NormanSearch
-
Gray Panthers v. AdministratorSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Schweiker v. GraySearch
-
Gray Panthers v. SecretarySearch
-
Preserve Overton Park v. VolpeSearch
-
Harris v. GraySearch
-
of the Act. Batterton v. FrancisSearch
-
Schweiker v. NormanSearch
-
Cf. Weinberger v. SalfiSearch
-
Potomac Electric Power Co. v. DirectorSearch
-
States. Cf. Batterton v. FrancisSearch
-
Compare Warth v. SeldinSearch
-
Cf. Chapman v. HoustonSearch
-
Lewis v. MartinSearch
-
Cf. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NaturalSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial