Citation network
Lehman Vs. Nakshian
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 26, 1981
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 156 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court Lehman v. NakshianSearch
-
U.S. 156 (1981) Lehman v. NakshianSearch
-
intent that ADEA plaintiffs who proceed to trial against the Federal Government may do so before a jury. Lorillard v. PonsSearch
-
requested a jury trial. The defendant moved to strike the request, and the District Court denied the motion. Nakshian v. ClaytorSearch
-
Page 453 U. S. 159 the District Court said, was an important basis for this Court's holding in Lorillard v. PonsSearch
-
b), a divided panel of the Court of Appeals affirmed. Nakshian v. ClaytorSearch
-
s decision in the Lorillard case. We granted certiorari to consider the issue presented. Sub nom. Hildalgo v. NakshianSearch
-
the Seventh Amendment right to trial by jury does not apply in actions against the Federal Government. In Galloway v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSearch
-
McElrath v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 392 , 424 U. S. 399 , quoting United States v. SherwoodSearch
-
U. S. 584 , 312 U. S. 586 . See also United States v. MitchellSearch
-
United States v. MitchellSearch
-
Page 453 U. S. 161 supra, at 445 U. S. 538 , quoting United States v. KingSearch
-
Soriano v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 352 U. S. 270 , 352 U. S. 276 . See also United States v. KubrickSearch
-
See Page 453 U. S. 163 Fedorenko v. UnitedSearch
-
Monroe v. StandardSearch
-
relying on Lorillard v. PonsSearch
-
Great American Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. NovotnySearch
-
The respondent relies on United States v. PfitschSearch
-
when the Seventh Amendment applies, or if not, when a statute provides it. The respondent also relies on Law v. UnitedSearch
-
Justice Brennan, With Whom Justice Marshall, Justice Blackmun, and Justice Stevens Join, Dissenting. in Lorillard V. PonsSearch
-
review and affirmed the ruling of the District Court that respondent is entitled to a jury trial. Nakshian v. ClaytorSearch
-
U. S. 392 , 424 U. S. 399 (1976), quoting United States v. SherwoodSearch
-
United States v. KingSearch
-
the United States has waived its immunity. Indeed, we have previously declined to adopt such a presumption. See Law v. UnitedSearch
-
See Law v. UnitedSearch
-
Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSearch
-
demonstrates congressional intent to allow a jury trial in ADEA suits against the Federal Government. In Lorillard v. PonsSearch
-
relief is available and legal rights are determined, the Seventh Amendment provides a right to jury trial. See Curtis v. LoetherSearch
-
Standard Oil v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 221 U. S. 1 , 221 U. S. 59 (1911). See Gilbert v. UnitedSearch
-
to civil actions against the Federal Government, Congress may extend the jury trial right by legislation. See Galloway v. UnitedSearch
-
the district courts rather than the Court of Claims supports an inference of a right to jury trial. In United States v. PfitschSearch
-
U.S. at 256 U. S. 552 . Similarly, in Law v. UnitedSearch
-
Nakshian v. ClaytorSearch
-
U.S.App.D.C. 59, 63, n. 4, 628 F.2d 59, 63, n. 4 (1980). The Court's reliance on Soriano v. UnitedSearch
-
There is, of course, no Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial against the Federal Government. Galloway v. UnitedSearch
-
provided Congress otherwise makes its intent known. Indeed, Rule 38 was fully applicable at the time of Lorillard v. PonsSearch
-
In United States v. PfitschSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Lehman v. NakshianSearch
-
Hildalgo v. NakshianSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial