Citation network
Haig Vs. Agee
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 29, 1981
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 280 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court Haig v. AgeeSearch
-
U.S. 280 (1981) Haig v. AgeeSearch
-
is one indicator of Executive policy, it suffices that the Executive has openly asserted the power at issue. Kent v. DullesSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
protections reach beyond our national boundaries, respondent's First Amendment claim is without foundation. See Near v. MinnesotaSearch
-
summary Page 453 U. S. 288 judgment for Agee, and ordered the Secretary to restore his passport. Agee v. VanceSearch
-
F.Supp. 729 (DC 1980). B A divided panel of the Court of Appeals affirmed. Agee v. MuskieSearch
-
administrative practice, Zemel v. RuskSearch
-
Id. at 52, 629 F.2d at 86. We granted certiorari sub nom. Muskie v. AgeeSearch
-
U. S. 290 is important, we begin with the language of the statute. See, e.g., Universities Research Assn. v. CoutuSearch
-
that the Secretary has the power to deny a passport for reasons not specified in the statutes. For example, in Kent v. DullesSearch
-
Nemours & Co. v. CollinsSearch
-
U. S. 46 , 432 U. S. 55 (1977), quoting Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCCSearch
-
In United States v. Curtiss-WrightSearch
-
related to foreign policy and national security are rarely proper subjects for judicial intervention. In Harisiades v. ShaughnessySearch
-
Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. WatermanSearch
-
Page 453 U. S. 298 1926, adopted the longstanding administrative construction of the 1856 statute. See Lorillard v. PonsSearch
-
Udall v. TallmanSearch
-
Norwegian Nitrogen Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Erlenbaugh v. UnitedSearch
-
NLRB v. BellSearch
-
denials of passports solely on the basis of political beliefs entitled to First Amendment protection. See Aptheker v. SecretarySearch
-
protection accorded beliefs, standing alone, is very different from the protection accorded conduct. Thus, in Aptheker v. SecretarySearch
-
States must be distinguished from the right to travel within the United States. This was underscored in Califano v. AznavorianSearch
-
equivalent to the constitutional right to interstate travel, recognized by this Court for over 100 years. Edwards v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Twining v. NewSearch
-
Williams v. FearSearch
-
Crandall v. NevadaSearch
-
The constitutional right of interstate travel is virtually unqualified, United States v. GuestSearch
-
Citations omitted.) Califano v. TorresSearch
-
that no governmental interest is more compelling than the security of the Nation. Aptheker v. SecretarySearch
-
Cole v. YoungSearch
-
protect the secrecy of our Government's foreign intelligence operations plainly serve these interests. Thus, in Snepp v. UnitedSearch
-
See also id. at 444 U. S. 511 -513. The Court in United States v. Curtiss-WrightSearch
-
U.S. at 299 U. S. 320 . Accord, Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. WatermanSearch
-
See Snepp v. UnitedSearch
-
States, supra. On this record, the Government is not required to hold a pre-revocation hearing. In Cole v. YoungSearch
-
CA App. 65. This language is identical to the clause which we construed in Snepp v. UnitedSearch
-
Agee v. CentralSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial