Citation network
Robbins Vs. California
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jul 01, 1981
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 420 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court Robbins v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U.S. 420 (1981) Robbins v. CaliforniaSearch
-
is constitutionally protected to the same extent as are closed pieces of luggage found anywhere else. United States v. ChadwickSearch
-
vacated the Court of Appeal's judgment, and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Arkansas v. SandersSearch
-
a neutral magistrate a warrant that satisfies the terms of the Warrant Clause of the Fourth Amendment. See, e.g., Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
Agnello v. UnitedSearch
-
Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
See Colorado v. BannisterSearch
-
U. S. 1 . In Carroll Page 453 U. S. 424 v. UnitedSearch
-
container found inside an automobile. Each time, the Court has refused to accept the suggestion. In United States v. ChadwickSearch
-
the Court has sometimes approved warrantless searches in which the automobile's mobility was irrelevant. See Cady v. DombrowskiSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
and contents travel in plain view, and that automobiles are necessarily highly regulated by government. United States v. ChadwickSearch
-
pieces of luggage are hidden from view, and luggage is not generally subject to state regulation. In Arkansas v. SandersSearch
-
pieces of sturdy luggage, like suitcases, and flimsier containers, like cardboard boxes. Compare, e.g., United States v. BensonSearch
-
United States v. MillerSearch
-
United States v. PreslerSearch
-
United States v. MeierSearch
-
United States v. JohnsonSearch
-
United States v. StevieSearch
-
F.2d 1175 (CA8 1978), with United States v. ManninoSearch
-
United States v. GoshornSearch
-
United States v. GoochSearch
-
United State v. MackeySearch
-
United States v. NeumannSearch
-
task might be accomplished. What one person may put into a suitcase, another may put into a paper bag. United States v. RossSearch
-
In particular, it is not argued that the opening of the packages was incident to a lawful custodial arrest. Cf. Chimel v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U. S. 752 . See Arkansas v. SandersSearch
-
in the judgment. The Court's judgment is justified, though not compelled, by the Court's opinion in Arkansas v. SandersSearch
-
to simple mechanical rules so that the constable has a fighting chance not to blunder. This case and New York v. BeltonSearch
-
situation of an encounter between an arresting officer and a suspect apprehended on the public highway. While Chimel v. CaliforniaSearch
-
automobile enjoy only a limited expectation of privacy in the interior of the automobile itself. See Almeida-Sanchez v. UnitedSearch
-
This limited interest is diminished further when the occupants are placed under custodial arrest. Cf. United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
Sanders, 442 U.S. at 442 U. S. 764 . See, e. United States v. ManninoSearch
-
United States v. MackeySearch
-
must undertake to determine whether a search violates the Fourth Amendment rights of a complaining party. See Rakas v. IllinoisSearch
-
Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
upon simple mischance. A prudent officer will err on the side of respecting ambiguous assertions of privacy, see Rakas v. IllinoisSearch
-
officer in the field when the public consequently must suffer from the suppression of probative evidence, cf. Brown v. IllinoisSearch
-
warrant required for postal inspectors to open sealed packages sent through mail). See also United States v. VanSearch
-
JUSTICE BLACKMUN, dissenting. I must dissent for the reasons stated in my respective writings in United States v. ChadwickSearch
-
U. S. 1 , 433 U. S. 17 (1977), and Arkansas v. SandersSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Robbins v. CaliforniaSearch
-
of Arkansas v. SandersSearch
-
In United States v. ChadwickSearch
-
See Cady v. DombrowskiSearch
-
In Arkansas v. SandersSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial