Citation network
Ralston Vs. Robinson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 02, 1981
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 201 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court Ralston v. RobinsonSearch
-
U.S. 201 (1981) Ralston v. RobinsonSearch
-
from his YCA sentence and will begin his first adult sentence. Page 454 U. S. 206 II In Dorszynski v. UnitedSearch
-
in judgment). We reiterated that trial courts retain significant control over sentencing options in Durst v. UnitedSearch
-
See Brown v. CarlsonSearch
-
FTC v. FredSearch
-
Page 454 U. S. 218 v. TheSearch
-
question presented. See 642 F.2d 1077 (1981). The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Thompson v. CarlsonSearch
-
warrants treating him immediately as an adult. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Outing v. BellSearch
-
F.2d 1144 (1980), cert. denied sub nom. Outing v. SmithSearch
-
See n 4, supra. See, e.g., Watts v. HaddenSearch
-
Outing v. BellSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
F.2d 1144 (CA4 1980), cert. denied sub nom. Outing v. SmithSearch
-
Dancy v. ArnoldSearch
-
Harvin v. UnitedSearch
-
Brown v. CarlsonSearch
-
Johnson v. BellSearch
-
See Thompson v. CarlsonSearch
-
court, after revoking probation, may impose any sentence that it might have imposed originally. See generally Durst v. UnitedSearch
-
such a sentence is authorized by any statute and, if so, whether it violates the Equal Protection Clause. Cf. Carter v. UnitedSearch
-
violates his term of probation has never been considered to raise a serious double jeopardy problem. See United States v. DiFrancescoSearch
-
Dorszynski v. UnitedSearch
-
Carter v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 113 U.S.App.D.C. 123, 125, 306 F.2d 283, 285 (1962) (quoting Cunningham v. UnitedSearch
-
justifies YCA terms within the statutory adult maximum, but longer than an adult would generally receive. See Watts v. HaddenSearch
-
p. 641 (9th ed. 1889) (emphasis added) (quoted in United States v. BenzSearch
-
Whalen v. UnitedSearch
-
Roberts v. UnitedSearch
-
Ex parte Lange, 18 Wall. 163, 85 U. S. 168 . Although United States v. DiFrancescoSearch
-
U. S. 117 , purports to confine Ex parte Lange and United States v. BenzSearch
-
This case closely parallels Roberts v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 113 U.S.App.D.C. 123, 125, 306 F.2d 283, 285 (1962). See United States v. McDonaldSearch
-
Rogers v. UnitedSearch
-
Blockburger v. UnitedSearch
-
Gore v. UnitedSearch
-
Thompson v. CarlsonSearch
-
Abernathy v. UnitedSearch
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
Brisco v. UnitedSearch
-
Kotz v. UnitedSearch
-
Eller v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Ralston v. RobinsonSearch
-
II In Dorszynski v. UnitedSearch
-
Durst v. UnitedSearch
-
the Third Circuit, Thompson v. CarlsonSearch
-
the Fourth Circuit, Outing v. BellSearch
-
Outing v. SmithSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial