Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Citizens Against Rent Control Vs. City of Berkeley

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 14, 1981

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

55 entries 6 linked 49 unlinked
Show
  1. Cantwell Vs. Connecticut US Supreme Court · May 20, 1940
  2. Naacp Vs. Alabama US Supreme Court · Jun 08, 1959
  3. Buckley Vs. Valeo US Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1976
  4. New York Times Co. Vs. Sullivan US Supreme Court · Mar 09, 1964
  5. James Vs. Valtierra US Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1971
  6. Kingsley Int'l Pictures Corp. Vs. Regents US Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1959
  7. Citizens Against Rent Control v. City
    Search
  8. of Berkeley - 454 U.S. 290 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court Citizens Against Rent Control v. City
    Search
  9. Fair Housing v. City
    Search
  10. while placing no limit on individuals acting alone, is clearly a restraint on the right of association. Buckley v. Valeo
    Search
  11. The California Supreme Court, dividing 4-3, reversed. 27 Cal.3d 819, 614 P.2d 742 (1980). Citing Buckley v. Valeo
    Search
  12. at 376 U. S. 266 , 376 U. S. 269 , quoting Associated Press v. United
    Search
  13. States, 326 U. S. 1 , 326 U. S. 20 (1945), and Roth v. United
    Search
  14. cannot properly be made to depend on a person's financial ability to engage in public discussion. Cf. Eastern R. Conf. v. Noerr
    Search
  15. CSC v. Letter
    Search
  16. limitations on contributions to committees formed to favor or oppose ballot measures. In C & C Plywood Corp. v. Hanson
    Search
  17. Let's Help Florida v. McCrary
    Search
  18. F.2d 195, 199 (1980). In First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti
    Search
  19. protects expression which is eloquent no less than that which is unconvincing.' Kingsley Int'l Pictures Corp. v. Regents
    Search
  20. was invalidated in Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. City
    Search
  21. of Berkeley, 60 Cal.App.3d 123, 131 Cal.Rptr. 350 (1976). Following Buckley v. Valeo
    Search
  22. Court of California must be reversed in this case. Unlike the factual situation in First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti
    Search
  23. aimed at corporations, as opposed to individuals. Therefore, my dissenting opinion in First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti
    Search
  24. State had granted to corporations as a form of quid pro quo for the limitation, does not come into play. Buckley v. Valeo
    Search
  25. to direct expenditures. As JUSTICE WHITE correctly notes in dissent, beginning with our decision in Buckley v. Valeo
    Search
  26. on the amount an individual can expend for his own speech. As we noted last term in California Medical Assn. v. FEC
    Search
  27. First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti
    Search
  28. of First Amendment freedoms. Ibid. (quoting Buckley v. Valeo
    Search
  29. measure elections. 435 U.S. at 435 U. S. 788 -789, citing and quoting Page 454 U. S. 303 United States v. Automobile
    Search
  30. say no more in order to reverse. Accordingly, we concur in the judgment. JUSTICE WHITE, dissenting. In Buckley v. Valeo
    Search
  31. invalidated that State's prohibition on corporate spending in referendum elections. First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti
    Search
  32. California Medical Assn. v. FEC
    Search
  33. Id. at 424 U. S. 22 . See NAACP v. Alabama
    Search
  34. and thus did not consider other possible interests for upholding the restriction. Indeed, at least since United States v. Automobile
    Search
  35. It was on a similar foundation that the Court upheld contribution limits in Buckley and California Medical Assn. v. FEC
    Search
  36. the Berkeley ordinance restricted expenditures as well as contributions to ballot measure campaigns. Following Buckley v. Valeo
    Search
  37. Court's invalidation of statewide expenditure limitations in ballot measure campaigns, Citizens for Jobs & Energy v. Fair
    Search
  38. on corporate and labor union contributions to ballot measure campaigns was invalidated. Pacific Gas & Electric Co v. City
    Search
  39. See Brown v. Superior
    Search
  40. See v. Key
    Search
  41. U.S. Supreme Court Citizens Against Rent Control v. City
    Search
  42. Fair Housing v. City
    Search
  43. Citing Buckley v. Valeo
    Search
  44. Associated Press v. United
    Search
  45. and Roth v. United
    Search
  46. Cf. Eastern R. Conf. v. Noerr
    Search
  47. In C & C Plywood Corp. v. Hanson
    Search
  48. In First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti
    Search
  49. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. City
    Search
  50. Following Buckley v. Valeo
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial