Citation network
Brown Vs. Glines
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 21, 1980
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 348 (1980) U.S. Supreme Court Brown v. GlinesSearch
-
U.S. 348 (1980) Brown v. GlinesSearch
-
on their face. Pp. 444 U. S. 353 -361. (a) Such regulations do not violate the First Amendment. Greer v. SpockSearch
-
Glines' motion for Page 444 U. S. 352 summary judgment and declared the regulations facially invalid. Glines v. WadeSearch
-
The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the finding of facial invalidity. Glines v. WadeSearch
-
Ibid. We granted certiorari, 440 U.S. 957 (1979), and we now reverse. II In Greer v. SpockSearch
-
Spock, protect a substantial Government interest unrelated to the suppression of free expression. See Procunier v. MartinezSearch
-
Department of Air Force v. RoseSearch
-
supra , at 417 U. S. 759 , quoting United States v. PriestSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Id. at 417 U. S. 744 , quoting Burns v. WilsonSearch
-
restrict speech no more than is reasonably necessary to protect the substantial governmental interest. See Procunier v. MartinezSearch
-
Department of Air Force v. RoseSearch
-
recognized that the military must possess substantial discretion over its internal discipline. See, e.g., Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSearch
-
commanders some flexibility in dealing with matters that affect internal discipline and morale. See, e.g., Middendorf v. HenrySearch
-
Huff v. SecretarySearch
-
Glines v. WadeSearch
-
Cert. 6, n. 2, error in the Court of Appeals' resolution of the issue would not affect our jurisdiction. Cf. Mathews v. EldridgeSearch
-
The Court of Appeals' decision and the discussion of this issue appear in its opinion in Allen v. MongerSearch
-
F.2d 438, 440-442 (1978), cert. pending sub nom. Brown v. AllenSearch
-
We specifically emphasized that the Army regulation at issue in Greer v. SpockSearch
-
The Navy regulations adopted pursuant to DOD Dir. 1325.6 are at issue in Secretary of Navy v. HuffSearch
-
c),(d) (1970). That part of the Army regulations was not at issue in Greer v. SpockSearch
-
by civilians. Furthermore, the military has greater authority over a serviceman than over a civilian. See Parker v. LevySearch
-
to such special restrictions on free expression as are reasonably necessary to promote effective government. See CSC v. LetterSearch
-
Kelley v. JohnsonSearch
-
maintenance of basic discipline and preparedness are as justified on a regular base in the United States, Schneider v. LairdSearch
-
Dash v. CommandingSearch
-
aff'd, 429 F.2d 427 (CA4 1970) (per curiam), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 981 (1971), as on a training base, Greer v. SpockSearch
-
supra, or a combat-ready installation in the Pacific, Carlson v. SchlesingerSearch
-
thus giving rise to legitimate claims under the First Amendment. Greer v. SpockSearch
-
Secretary of Navy v. HuffSearch
-
in Spock -- never requested permission to circulate his materials, has not and cannot raise such a claim. Greer v. SpockSearch
-
Curry v. SecretarySearch
-
In Huff v. SecretarySearch
-
the right to express ideas, see, e.g., Page 444 U. S. 363 Street v. NewSearch
-
Martin v. CitySearch
-
U. S. 141 , 319 U. S. 143 (1943), the right to be exposed to ideas expressed by others, see, e.g., Staley v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Lamont v. PostmasterSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Brown v. GlinesSearch
-
the First Amendment. Greer v. SpockSearch
-
II In Greer v. SpockSearch
-
See Procunier v. MartinezSearch
-
United States v. PriestSearch
-
Cf. Mathews v. EldridgeSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial