Citation network
Committee for Pub. Educ. Vs. Regan
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 20, 1980
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 646 (1980) U.S. Supreme Court Committee for Pub. Educ. v. ReganSearch
-
U.S. 646 (1980) Committee for Public Education and Religious Liberty v. ReganSearch
-
and teacher-prepared tests, had been held to be violative of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment in Levitt v. CommitteeSearch
-
the costs of so complying with state law has primarily a secular, rather than a religious, purpose and effect. Wolman v. WalterSearch
-
will not be read into the plan as an inevitability. Pp. 444 U. S. 659 -661. (e) The decision in Meek v. PittengerSearch
-
and reporting services mandated by state law. The District Court sustained the statute. Committee for Public Education v. LevittSearch
-
of school financial records that would ensure that public funds were used only for secular purposes. In Levitt v. CommitteeSearch
-
Ibid., quoting Lemon v. KurtzmanSearch
-
was deemed to constitute an impermissible aid to religion. The Court distinguished its earlier holdings in Everson v. BoardSearch
-
of Education, 330 U. S. 1 (1947), and Board of Education v. AllenSearch
-
U.S. at 413 U. S. 481 , quoting Lemon v. KurtzmanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
invalidated the enactment with respect to both the tests and the reporting procedure. Committee for Public Education v. LevittSearch
-
F.Supp. 1174 (1976) ( Levitt II ). The District Court understood the decision in Meek v. PittengerSearch
-
to this Court. We vacated the District Court's judgment and remanded the case in light of our decision in Wolman v. WalterSearch
-
nor inhibits religion, and if it does not foster an excessive government entanglement with religion. See Roemer v. MarylandSearch
-
U.S. at 403 U. S. 612 -613. In Wolman v. WalterSearch
-
Wolman v. WalterSearch
-
examinations, passed our Establishment Clause tests. III We agree with the District Court that Wolman v. WalterSearch
-
with the factual or legal characterization of the testing procedure arrived at by the District Court. As in Wolman v. WalterSearch
-
But here, as we shall see, the New York law provides ample safeguards against excessive or misdirected reimbursement. v. TheSearch
-
VI It is urged that the District Court judgment is unsupportable under Meek v. PittengerSearch
-
for Appellants 9-11. The difficulty with this position is that a majority of the Court, including the author of Meek v. PittengerSearch
-
has repeatedly held the Establishment Clause applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment. E.g., Meek v. PittengerSearch
-
As MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN wrote in Roemer v. MarylandSearch
-
Cf. New York v. CathedralSearch
-
conceivably occur under a system of state aid involving direct appropriations. Cf. Committee for Public Education v. NyquistSearch
-
providing public aid to parochial schools. Page 444 U. S. 663 I thought that the Court's judgments in Meek v. PittengerSearch
-
U. S. 349 (1975), and in Wolman v. WalterSearch
-
is not. The line necessarily was not a straight one. It could not be, when this Court, on the one hand, in Everson v. BoardSearch
-
of the cost of fares for the transportation of children attending parochial schools, and in Board of Education v. AllenSearch
-
to students in private secondary schools was not violative of those Amendments, and yet, on the other hand, in Lemon v. KurtzmanSearch
-
from nonpublic schools, and also in Levitt v. CommitteeSearch
-
to reimburse nonpublic schools for the expenses of tests and examinations. See also Committee for Public Education v. NyquistSearch
-
a tuition reimbursement plan, and tax relief for parents who did not qualify for tuition reimbursement, and Sloan v. LemonSearch
-
invalid a state plan for parental reimbursement of a portion of nonpublic school tuition expenses. And see Roemer v. MarylandSearch
-
Court initially and unanimously to hold New York's revised plan to be unconstitutional, Committee for Public Education v. LevittSearch
-
Levitt II ), and that prompted Judge Ward, in his persuasive dissent in Levitt III, Committee for Public Education v. LevittSearch
-
by Chapter 507 differs significantly from the types of state aid to religious schools approved by the Court in Wolman v. WalterSearch
-
of neutral testing organizations. It did not authorize direct financial aid of any type to religious schools. Wolman v. WalterSearch
-
administered in part on the sectarian premises, on the basis of its recognition in a number of cases, see, e.g., Meek v. PittengerSearch
-
id. at 433 U. S. 252 , n. 18, created by Board of Education v. AllenSearch
-
Pub. Educ. v. ReganSearch
-
Public Education and Religious Liberty v. ReganSearch
-
Levitt v. CommitteeSearch
-
Public Education v. LevittSearch
-
In Levitt v. CommitteeSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial