Citation network
Stafford Vs. Briggs
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 20, 1980
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 527 (1980) U.S. Supreme Court Stafford v. BriggsSearch
-
U.S. 527 (1980) Stafford v. BriggsSearch
-
federal officials in their individual capacities. 439 U.S. 1113 (1979). I No. 77-1546 Stafford et al. v. BriggsSearch
-
damages actions against federal officials to be brought in any district in which any one defendant resides. Briggs v. GoodwinSearch
-
analysis of International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSearch
-
in which a particular federal court sits before they may be sued in that court. No. 78-303 Colby et al. v. DriverSearch
-
filed, but it reversed as to those defendants who had left their Government positions at the time of filing. Driver v. HelmsSearch
-
the federal Page 444 U. S. 534 trial courts generally the power to issue writs of mandamus. McIntire v. WoodSearch
-
which derived power to issue the writ from the common law of the State af Maryland, were the sole exception. Kendall v. UnitedSearch
-
relief instead. But in most cases, a superior federal officer was an indispensable party. See, e.g., Williams v. FanningSearch
-
ibid., we turn to the legislative history. Schlanger v. SeamansSearch
-
U. S. 487 , 401 U. S. 490 , n. 4 (1971). See also United States v. CulbertSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Train v. ColoradoSearch
-
e) has been rejected by this Court. In Schlanger v. SeamansSearch
-
Together with No. 78-303, Colby, Director, Central Intelligence Agency, et al. v. DriverSearch
-
transfer request. He also moved for dismissal on grounds of prosecutorial immunity. This motion was denied. See Briggs v. GoodwinSearch
-
the Government, we decline to treat this one cryptic sentence as dispositive of the legislative intent. See Blackburn v. GoodwinSearch
-
See Larson v. DomesticSearch
-
Ante at 444 U. S. 535 , quoting Brown v. DuchesneSearch
-
How. 183, 60 U. S. 194 . See Steelworkers v. WeberSearch
-
requires only certain minimum contacts between the defendant and the sovereign that has created the court. See Shaffer v. HeitnerSearch
-
International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSearch
-
e) in our holding in Schlanger v. SeamansSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Stafford v. BriggsSearch
-
Briggs v. GoodwinSearch
-
of International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSearch
-
Driver v. HelmsSearch
-
McIntire v. WoodSearch
-
Kendall v. UnitedSearch
-
Williams v. FanningSearch
-
Court. In Schlanger v. SeamansSearch
-
See Briggs v. GoodwinSearch
-
See Blackburn v. GoodwinSearch
-
See Steelworkers v. WeberSearch
-
See Shaffer v. HeitnerSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial